Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two gun bills pass out of state House committee (CO)
The Gazette ^ | February 12, 2013 10:26 PM | MEGAN SCHRADER

Posted on 02/13/2013 9:22:38 AM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Red Steel

“Rep. Pete Lee, D-Colorado Springs, voted in favor of the bills and said no constitutional rights are absolute”

Rats don’t believe that for a minute. They believe that the right of a woman to murder her unborn children IS absolute.


21 posted on 02/13/2013 12:20:46 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (There is no requirement to show need in order to exercise your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

“Anyway, are the antis really so ignorant that they believe people who have criminal intent are going to go through all the hoops to legally acquire and keep a gun, just to proceed with their criminal intent?”

The supporters are that ignorant. The folks masterminding this stampede could care less. This is a step toward gun registration—there will be 4473’s for every gun in America sold after this date. That’s all they care about.


22 posted on 02/13/2013 3:17:34 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
That's why I say, time for some “civil disobedience” of our own (if that's the right term for it). If the illegal aliens can have sanctuary cities when their very presence here is against the Constitution, then we should designate sanctuary areas for gun owners, considering we have the backing of the Constitution. On top of that, we need to just not leave paper trails like good little sheep. They get rewarded for flouting the Constitution, they will want to punish us for following it. But I want to force them into the position of making the hypocrisy apparent. Non-compliance.
23 posted on 02/13/2013 3:59:59 PM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

It’s on Drudge. “http://denver.cbslocal.com/2013/02/12/denver-considers-whether-to-opt-in-or-out-of-amendment-64/";


24 posted on 02/13/2013 4:30:00 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (I own a weapon to protect my family from those wanting to take that weapon away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

well isn’t that precious. the colorado dims say we can’t increase penalties for child abduction BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE LAWS ON THE BOOKS but these same libturds don;’t think there are enough anti 2nd ammendment laws on the books. crime is up in denver thanks to pot laws and the libturds once again care more about criminals (including illegals) than us citizens.
how are they going to enforce background checks of sales between private citizens? how are they even going to know? does it apply to out of state sales? how about 20 round magazines brought across the state line? are surrounding states going to not sell them to colorado residents? typical not very well thought out bs law from idiot anti constitution libturds.


25 posted on 02/13/2013 8:41:27 PM PST by bravo whiskey (“People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Be careful, Coloradans; be very careful:

http://voxvocispublicus.homestead.com/Battle-of-Athens.html


26 posted on 02/14/2013 4:30:02 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
How does saying that the Federal and State governments need follow the Constitution equate to "proposing a lawless society"? The government ignoring the constitution fosters a lawless society.

The meaning of the 2nd amendment is clear despite the obsfucation from people that wish to overthrow our system of government. The meaning of the term "infringe" is equally clear. Virtually all gun control laws are therefore unconsitutional.

I have no idea how you could claim that the Federal and State constitutions say otherwise unless you have one of those USSC decoder rings that shows the hidden and sometime opposite meaning from the old plainly written constitution.

27 posted on 02/14/2013 6:54:26 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson