Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/13/2013 10:20:07 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I will say that for Obama. He is a Muslim killing machine.


2 posted on 02/13/2013 10:23:50 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Indiscriminate lethal capability controlled by remote pilots directed by an innocuous government apparatus, all directed by a corrupt, immoral, unprincipled Executive Branch that only concentrates on effecting its hidden agenda.

That should bring much comfort into the minds of the citizens of this country when they see these Predators, Raptors and smaller UAS killers orbiting their cities and countryside.


3 posted on 02/13/2013 10:26:34 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The real puzzle is why so many Americans seem happy to trust the president with this power.

51% of the people in this country voted for him. To vote for him you would have to be stupid. Conclusion 51% of the american populace is stupid. If you're stupid, then you don;t realize that what can be done to one person can be done to every person.

Due process is one of the safeguards that separate us from murderous governments like Pol Pot's Cambodia, Nazi Germany, Mao's China, the former USSR, etc. 0bama has taken another step along the path he wants to convert the USA form a free country to a tyrannical police state. Heil 0bama.

4 posted on 02/13/2013 10:26:53 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Or incendiary grenades.

< / Dorner >


9 posted on 02/13/2013 11:38:41 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Of the government, by the government, and for the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m quite shocked they’re actually speaking about “national defense” instead of it being part of an overseas war zone, so hall’s fair, or at least nation security—which is more nebulous—or national interest—which is most nebulous of all. Do they honestly expect us to believe they’re only assassinating people who pose an imminent threat to the homefront? In those “due process” conversations within the White House—most likely consisting of a passing, “Oh, by the way Bob, I wanna blow up so and so tomorrow. That cool?” “Whatever.” at the watercooler—are we to believe they’re actually discussing how likely it is targets will cause another 9/11 in a few days? Because I don’t.


10 posted on 02/13/2013 11:45:55 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Or maybe I should give them the benefit of the doubt, and the national defense assassination standard is like Wickard v Filburn. Meaning they don’t pretend the homeland is in immediate danger, but considered along with all other terrorist forces the individual in question could be considered to produce a “substantial effect” upon defensiveness...ah, nevermind. This makes no sense.


11 posted on 02/13/2013 11:49:44 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson