[MichaelCorleone]

Don’t let up.

The Agenda 21 Marxists smell blood in the water. We must preserve our rights at all hazards.

Don’t let up.

[LibWhacker]

the proposals would lead to “confiscation” of citizens’ firearms.

And that's the least of it. It doesn't take a genius to see there is a very great likelihood it would lead to bloodshed on a massive scale, pushing many formerly law-abiding Americans who have never gotten so much as a speeding ticket in their entire boring lives, completely over the edge into desperado territory.

And for what? An unjust punitive measure that has been erroneously aimed directly at them, that is blatantly unconstitutional, and has absolutely no hope of reducing gun violence whatsoever but, in fact, will increase it.

[vigilence]

It seems to me that the better argument to make is this: If we allow the government to FURTHER infringe on the Second Amendment where does their ability to strip us of our rights end? Which Amendment will be next? Free Speech? States rights? The slope gets very slippery when gun grabbers target one right but feel safe that the others won’t be targeted. Just remember, it is the Second that protects the rest.

[BitWielder1]

Step by tiny little step they are making it harder to own guns.
More laws every year, types of guns, where they can be carried, more background checks, more restrictions on who can own a gun, difficult or expensive permits, mandatory "gun insurance" and so on, until every single one of us will run afoul of some rule or another.
We're not breaking the law, but make no mistake, the law is out to break us.
Anyone who is prepared to go a long with some new little "sensible" gun law, please consider the big picture.

[Random Access]

If anyone decides to join the NRA, which I encourage everyone to do, use a fake e-mail address unless you want to get spammed to death for things like hearing aids and insurance policies.

They disable the “opt out” link at the bottom of their spam which really pisses me off. They can carry on their work protecting our 2nd amendment rights, but they should do it without spamming their members.

[familyop]

"...and said lawmakers owed it to the victims to move on the issue..."

That's why there are so few whole, real families now. Feminists and their romanticist friends disseminated and broadcast stories from various locations on our planet about individual victims for decades--stories devised to evoke emotional responses from readers and listeners.

Our worst laws were brought by emotions, hysteria and other subjective responses from our spoiled peers. Things, including the economy, will get much worse, until more of us can make decisions based on manly, analytical thought, like the thought of our forefathers.

[Jack Hammer]

Firearms have been a part of American life for three hundred years, yet it’s only been in the past twenty or thirty years that they’ve become an issue.

That is precisely because the society and its people have degenerated to the point where firearms crime has proliferated; fix society, don’t scr*w around with the firearms.

That’s the essence of the solution, and it’s precisely what the Democrats - who have f*cked up our society with their half-arsed programs - don’t want to address.

Instead, they play all this smoke and mirrors with the firearms.

It’s all a monstrous load of bullsh*t, the whole effing thing.