Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to push universal preschool proposal
Yahoo ^

Posted on 02/14/2013 8:04:17 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Sub-Driver

FMCDH!


41 posted on 02/14/2013 9:12:40 AM PST by HomeAtLast ( You're either with the Tea Party, or you're with the EBT Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Mrs. Don-o

The fact is that children actually raised, educated and trained in the HOME are less likely to show up on the police blotter.

oops - can’t say that. What about the social(ism)ization?


42 posted on 02/14/2013 9:13:04 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Bingo. Isn’t it great that we still get to pay for all these bastard children we didn’t sire? What a wonderful place America is becoming. I’m beginning to think we should set up free spay clinics to serve Democrat females.


43 posted on 02/14/2013 9:16:28 AM PST by Trod Upon (The Second Amendment acknowledges our inherent right to revolt if tyrannized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama cast his preschool plan as a way to bring low-income and minority children up to speed with higher-income children.

On the plus side it gives the low-income and minority children a chance to see what a father looks like at pick up time.

/s


44 posted on 02/14/2013 9:22:29 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
They need their parents around more, but they can’t be since they have to work long hours to pay the taxes that go to slackers who vote democrat.

If that is why they are working long hours, they are part of the problem. In fact, anyone who pays income tax is feeding the beast they claim to loathe.

45 posted on 02/14/2013 9:26:56 AM PST by HomeAtLast ( You're either with the Tea Party, or you're with the EBT Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Overheard in a future government run preschool:

“OK, let’s all try to put our condoms on our banana. Timothy! We don’t eat the banana, we insert the banana, see? Oh, everyone look at Hannah. She’s got the idea.”
“Story time! Let’s sit on the carpet. Today we get to read “Mary has two mommies!”


46 posted on 02/14/2013 9:29:49 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why does the federal government bother to do studies if they are then going to choose to ignore the results. Here is a study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services that concluded that Head Start was a waste of resources. Read it for yourself.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/14/head-start-sad-and-costly-secret-what-washington-doesnt-want-to-know/?intcmp=obnetwork#ixzz2I9aafwfY


47 posted on 02/14/2013 9:33:44 AM PST by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

They must have read “Walden II”, a utopian wet dream. Parents are discouraged from raising their own children.


48 posted on 02/14/2013 9:34:45 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And more public union employees


49 posted on 02/14/2013 9:37:04 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Didn’t the Pigs in animal farm take the dog’s puppies?


50 posted on 02/14/2013 9:38:45 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

The transformation will be partially accomplished through our children. Soon, even 4-years old will not be early enough.


51 posted on 02/14/2013 9:42:28 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
What's the definition of insanity again?

The prior version of this idiocy was a total failure, by the White House's own "Federal Programs Report Card."

Change the name and hope for a sane result?

52 posted on 02/14/2013 9:42:56 AM PST by publius911 (Look for the Unin label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sfimom

“At conception.”

If they decide to let the kid live, they can schedule him/her for socialist programming to begin immediately after birth. It sickens me to think that children would do better with ANYONE but their parents at this tender young age.

The “State” would serve the population best by making it possible, through their policies, for average families to be able to have decent standards of living on one parent’s wages so that mothers (if they so choose) can remain home to nurture the precious “next generation.”

That being said, I would venture to say that some children, no matter what their age, are in unhealthy/unsafe family situations and would probably be better off in the care of strangers at pre-school, anyways. A sad statement, I know.


53 posted on 02/14/2013 9:43:08 AM PST by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: don-o

The left will try to figure out a way to exclude those who “escape” from the ability to earn a living or consume goods.

IE, mark of the beast.


54 posted on 02/14/2013 9:45:59 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It will be interesting to see what kind of sexual education the Nanny state will come up with for pre-schoolers in the next few years.


55 posted on 02/14/2013 9:57:59 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

And once it’s mandatory, then it’s unionized.


56 posted on 02/14/2013 10:58:54 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Preschool is not a necessity, and many children fare better in the home environment in these formative years.

The reason Obama is promoting this is not for the sake of the children, it is for his own reasons.

57 posted on 02/14/2013 11:16:58 AM PST by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
The fact is that children actually raised, educated and trained in the HOME by their married mother and father are less likely to show up on the police blotter.

oops - can't say that. What about the social(ism)ization?

My addition to your comment will really get them going.

58 posted on 02/14/2013 11:24:45 AM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I see those Hitler and Communist Youth Programs are still on track.


59 posted on 02/15/2013 11:43:06 AM PST by DarkWaters ("Deception is a state of mind --- and the mind of the state" --- James Jesus Angleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson