Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
You’ll never get to the Founders’ vision on this one. It was tried and it didn’t work. There’s a reason that body degraded over the course of the 19th century that prompted the 17th to be passed.

Would you be so kind as to provide more depth and exploration to this comment?

71 posted on 02/18/2013 2:55:09 AM PST by Lazamataz (Republicans have the same policies as the Democrats, except for the part where they win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

I covered a lot of that in this thread, Laz...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2986688/posts

Short version: the bossism, bribery, puppetry, special interests, corruption and arrogance did in the Senate under the legislatively-elected era. Most of your Senate giants that some around here think would magically reappear with repeal ended before the Civil War occurred.

One of the key elements of “recalling” Senators (which wasn’t an actual feature, since that would mean impeachment, and only the U.S. Senate could do that — it was a gentleman’s agreement to step down if asked) that wouldn’t obey the instructions of a given legislature all but stopped before the 1850s. Once elected to a six-year term, they would cling to their seats even if the legislature hated their guts.

In Georgia, as with my Texas example further up in the thread, you wouldn’t be electing Ted Cruz types, but more replicas of Saxby Chambliss and Isakson. No Conservatives need apply. Even up here in TN, Lamar! and Corker would be perpetually safe. It’s the primary process that needs changing.


75 posted on 02/18/2013 3:09:07 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson