Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/18/2013 4:21:39 AM PST by sopwith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sopwith

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm


2 posted on 02/18/2013 4:24:15 AM PST by sopwith (don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

Black is the new tephlon just ask charlie rangle, maxine waters, marion barry and now jesse jackson jr. 3 navy seals and an ambassidor murdered and you think this has legs?


3 posted on 02/18/2013 4:27:00 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Lexington and Concord Americans experience thier first gun grab attempt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

I sure as hell would not plan to invite guests over to celebrate that he was found guilty.

We all know how the system works.


4 posted on 02/18/2013 4:29:31 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

No surprise. Surely we understood that Pres. O would never have to even prove he is a citizen or anything else.


6 posted on 02/18/2013 4:34:34 AM PST by winkadink (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

Be ready for another Roberts stab in the back.


7 posted on 02/18/2013 4:48:44 AM PST by ZULU (See: http://gatesofvienna.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

And obamas’ mouthpieces ask “What difference does it make?”


10 posted on 02/18/2013 5:20:11 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

They have the goods on Obama. I hope they do the right thing. It would be a good thing to finally punish someone who did the wrong thing.


15 posted on 02/18/2013 5:54:50 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

“which indicates that it has rejected arguments that Obama used forged IDs in order to to run for political office, actions that are considered a felony.”

False. Failure to put this case on the docket would indicate rejection of an appeal on points of law and procedure. The SC would have chosen NOT to hear arguments or review evidence even about that, much less the actual case against Obama.


21 posted on 02/18/2013 6:21:27 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

bump


23 posted on 02/18/2013 6:22:08 AM PST by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith
 photo white-house-2_zpscab8d62b.jpg
26 posted on 02/18/2013 7:15:46 AM PST by RetSignman ("...a Republic if you can keep it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith
Isn't it interesting how the second page of the article has an intentional "accidentally placed" photo OVER part of the text?

I believe that text reads as follows: And just now the whole article has changed, and reads entirely different.
29 posted on 02/18/2013 7:44:06 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

“On Friday, the nation’s highest court released a list of granted petitions which indicates that it has rejected arguments that Obama used forged IDs in order to to run for political office, actions that are considered a felony.”

Duh!!! This is what has happened to the other 5-10 eligibility lawsuits that have reached the SCOTUS. They are not going to touch this issue with a 10 foot pole.


38 posted on 02/18/2013 8:54:16 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sopwith

Going to the Supreme Court will never succeed in unseating BHO2. Why?

The Constititonal power to remove a sitting President solely rests with the Legislative branch (Congress), NOT to the Judicial branch. The House of Representatives brings up orders of Impeachment and the Senate, using the evidence provided by the HoR, tries the President.


50 posted on 02/22/2013 2:35:14 AM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson