I have every bit of comptemt for that ass Haat who killed “innecent” people.
Wish I could think of a more appropriate description than “people”.
It’s horrible what happened but, I can’t conflate the two.
The subject of this article is Callous disregard of the lives of three people, who deserve to live their lives without fear of being attacked by those who are entrusted to protect them.
Why can’t you admit you went off the wall or to another tangent, that is not germain or relevant to subject or proposition of the article?
You’re not a bad man or an evil Freeper but, you keep parsing the conversation for some odd reason and I’m at a loss understanding what your point is.
Bottom line: Dorner got his just dessert but, the innocent didn’t deserve what happened to them.
I would’ve offed Dorner, given the circumstance of responsibility.
I would not have shot at someone I was not absolutely certain was a danger.
Just won’t.
Nor would I. I've stated repeatedly that the cops involved should be held criminally and civilly responsible for their actions.
Apparently there are too many posters incapable of understanding plain English.