Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Denial Over 'Zero Dark Thirty'
Townhall.com ^ | February 26, 2013 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 02/26/2013 2:18:09 AM PST by Kaslin

You've got to admit that it's awfully precious that there was a huge controversy about "Zero Dark Thirty" because Kathryn Bigelow's film suggested that enhanced interrogation techniques helped intelligence officials find Osama bin Laden but no controversy about the final mission in the movie -- to kill, but not capture, the al-Qaida leader.

Some of the film's defenders believe that the controversy robbed "Zero Dark Thirty," Bigelow, actress Jessica Chastain and screenwriter Mark Boal of well-deserved Oscars. Maybe so but maybe not; a number of fine films were up for best picture this year.

But it cannot have helped that Ed Asner and other Hollywood lefties urged Academy members not to vote for the film, because they believed that it glorified "torture." And it probably didn't help that author Naomi Wolf called Bigelow a "Leni Riefenstahl-like propagandist of torture."

It also cannot have helped that the family of Sept. 11 flight attendant Betty Ann Ong -- who alerted American Airlines that her plane was being hijacked --was demanding that filmmakers apologize for using Ong's voice, list her name among the credits and include a disclaimer that the Ong family does not endorse torture.

Other critics have acknowledged that Bigelow and Boal depicted the ugly side of intelligence extraction, but they expressed dismay that the film did not depict more hand-wringing on the part of CIA interrogators and decision-makers.

It also cannot have helped the film's Oscar prospects that three senators -- Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Carl Levin and Republican John McCain -- sent a letter to Sony Pictures to voice their "deep disappointment" in the film's "suggestion that torture resulted in information that led to the location of ... bin Laden." The three senators also harrumphed that the movie was "factually inaccurate."

The irony here is that the letter prompted acting CIA Director Michael Morell to acknowledge that though he thought the film had sold the agency's dogged teamwork short in many ways and falsely left the impression that the agency's "former detention and interrogation program were the key to finding bin Laden," some of the intelligence that led to bin Laden indeed "came from detainees subjected to enhanced techniques."

The controversy also dredged up a 2011 letter that Leon Panetta, defense secretary and former CIA director, sent to McCain. The Washington Post reported that Panetta wrote, "Some of the detainees who provided useful information about the facilitator/courier's role had been subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques." Panetta also has said he believes that the information could have been extracted without enhanced interrogation techniques.

Both letters suggest that on the senators' big sticking point -- whether enhanced techniques helped bring bin Laden to justice -- "Zero Dark Thirty" was on the money. What they call torture produced results, and they don't want the public to know that. That's why some heavyweights in Washington and Hollywood were rooting for Bigelow and company to fail.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: academyawards; interrogation; oscars; torture; waterboarding; zerodarkthirty

1 posted on 02/26/2013 2:18:17 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Got to admit it’s kinda funny that those heroic Moslem terrorists come over here to kill old women and children and bomb and/or shoot the defenseless from cover and run like h*ll, and no one on the Left gives a fig, but they do get all misty-eyed if they hear that one of these same terrorists has been locked up without his three hots and a cot, basketball court, television, access to legal counsel, gymnasium privileges, and better healthcare than that enjoyed by most Americans.


2 posted on 02/26/2013 2:58:36 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I enjoyed the movie...a lot! First, I love “payback” type moveies, and I love movies where the good guys get the bad guy (America hating Lefties hate that). I actually saw it for the first time on my laptop here in Afghanistan (pretty cool). Good movie.


3 posted on 02/26/2013 3:00:00 AM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought the political pressure put on the film maker, not to mention the critics at the time of its release and the jury at the awards, was disgraceful. I can’t think of a time ever before when a US movie has been subject to so much heavy-handed political intrusion.

But I think another reason for this, aside from the torture, is that it showed that Obama had next to nothing to do with getting bin Laden, and that in fact not only did the “hunt” begin on 9/11/01, but it was carried out in the face of considerable opposition by some forces in later years (presumably under Obama). Also, the nice guy techniques didn’t work (remember the team that got blown up trusting a supposed informant, for whom they had even baked a birthday cake...a true story, btw) because the Islamists simply hate us and can’t be trusted.


4 posted on 02/26/2013 3:02:16 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I think that one unsaid area of controversy, where the movie showed the Brennan character on his prayer rug praying and bowing to Mecca and Medina, was the real problem. The Obamabots didn't want Brennan outed as a Muslim convert before his appointment to head the CIA was done. This Admin lies, cheats, steals and intimidates (just look at the machinations from them about the Sequestration) daily. Disgusting.
5 posted on 02/26/2013 3:21:21 AM PST by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The whole Academy process has been worthless for decades. Very few outstanding movies and the people who made them are recognized and the award ceremonies are interminable stretches infantile gushing and leftist twaddle.

The only relevent fact is that Zero Dark Thirty is an excellent movie and reasonably accurate (no movie has even come close to depicting combat well). Ms Bigelow deserves credit for coming up with a gripping, well-paced story that treats its audience with respect and doesn't cut corners. It holds interest throughout and at the end, the audience almost always applauds its final success.

I give it 3 1/2 stars of four and highly recommend it with the caution that it may be too intense for children or draft-dodging liberals.

6 posted on 02/26/2013 4:27:25 AM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I think you’re right about Brennan.


7 posted on 02/26/2013 4:28:46 AM PST by optiguy (Winter is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I decided not to see the movie as soon as I saw the title. For over 20 years the term was “oh dark thirty”, not zero dark thirty.
Of course that was a long time ago, it may have changed.


8 posted on 02/26/2013 4:36:23 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Some of the film's defenders believe that the controversy robbed "Zero Dark Thirty," Bigelow, actress Jessica Chastain and screenwriter Mark Boal of well-deserved Oscars.

Absolutely it did. Pretty funny since Obama's team wanted the movie made for political purposes. Kudos to Bigelow for making the movie (more) accurately.

9 posted on 02/26/2013 5:11:28 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If di fi condemned it, it must be good.


10 posted on 02/26/2013 5:18:17 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

The Senate Intelligence Committee Has Finally Dropped Its Investigation Into Zero Dark Thirty

Ben Child, The Guardian | 6 minutes ago | 3 |

Just a day after Zero Dark Thirty foundered at the Oscars, taking just a single technical prize, the high-profile US senate investigation that may have helped scupper the drama’s awards season has been quietly dropped.

With Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal having previously won best film in 2010 for The Hurt Locker, Zero Dark Thirty – about the hunt for Osama bin Laden – was one of the early frontrunners for this year’s Oscars and took many of the critics’ prizes that preface the bigger awards ceremonies. But then disquiet grew over the film’s depiction of the CIA’s alleged use of torture in the hunt for the leader of al-Qaida.

In January the US Senate intelligence committee launched an investigation into whether Bigelow and Boal were granted “inappropriate access” to classified CIA material after the committee’s Democratic chair Dianne Feinstein and member John McCain, the former Republican US presidential candidate, expressed concern about Zero Dark Thirty’s torture scenes. In an article on the Guardian website Naomi Wolf later compared Bigelow with the Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl.

The film soon became a political football, with the film-makers furiously defending their right to include fictional elements. “It’s a movie. I’ve been saying from the beginning it’s a movie,” Boal said last month. “That shouldn’t be too confusing. It’s in cinemas and if it’s not totally obvious, a CIA agent wasn’t really an Australian [Jason Clarke] that was on a lot of TV shows and Jessica Chastain isn’t really a CIA agent; she’s a very talented actress. But I think most American audiences understand that.” Speaking at the New York Film Critics Circle awards, where she won best director, Bigelow said: “I thankfully want to say that I’m standing in a room of people who understand that depiction is not endorsement, and if it was, no artist could ever portray inhumane practices; no author could ever write about them; and no film-maker could ever delve into the knotty subjects of our time.”

Zero Dark Thirty received unexpected support from leftwing film-maker Michael Moore, who defended the drama as “a disturbing, fantastically-made movie” that “will make you hate torture”. But the damage was done in the eyes of Oscars voters, especially after Academy member David Clennon called for a boycott.

When the Oscar nominees were announced on 10 January, Bigelow surprisingly missed out on a nod for best director and her film was left to compete only for best picture, best original screenwriting (Boal), best actress (Chastain) and two editing prizes. On Sunday night, Chastain lost out to Silver Linings Playbook’s Jennifer Lawrence and Boal was defeated by Django Unchained’s Quentin Tarantino. Zero Dark Thirty ultimately had to be content with a single gong for best sound editing, in a tie with James Bond movie Skyfall.

A congressional aide, speaking anonymously, yesterday told Reuters the Senate intelligence committee had closed its inquiry. Studio Sony, which produced the film, had no immediate comment and neither Bigelow nor Boal has yet made a public statement.

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/senate-intelligence-investigation-zero-dark-thirty-2013-2#ixzz2M12OIxg3


11 posted on 02/26/2013 6:33:39 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Just curious ... how do you pronounce 0500 (time of day)?


12 posted on 02/26/2013 6:44:59 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When it became apparent the movie wasn’t going to hail obama as a hero, they all, including obama’s ass kisser mccain, turned on it.

As for mccain, I’d like to see a movie about his time in captivity. I guarantee he’d scream to high Heaven about that IF it was a TRUE depiction. Ask many of the POWs who were in the hell hole with him. He’s not too well liked. The guy is as big a fraud as obama.


13 posted on 02/26/2013 7:14:50 AM PST by Terry Mross (How long before America is gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I was taught to pronounce it “OH-FIVE HUNDRED”


14 posted on 02/26/2013 7:19:22 AM PST by Terry Mross (How long before America is gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross; ArrogantBustard

I can’t remember with certainty, but I don’t recall any Ohs in the Artillery or elsewhere, it seems to me that a zero had to be a zero.


15 posted on 02/26/2013 11:56:38 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

oh five hundred.


16 posted on 02/26/2013 2:33:03 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

So then a complete work of fiction, trying to pass itself off as a true story wins Best Picture.


17 posted on 02/26/2013 2:38:45 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; R. Scott; Terry Mross

Thank you.

My exposure to this comes primarily through aviation (FWIW) ... I hear “OH” primarily from older guys, and “ZERO” primarily from younger guys. I use “ZERO”, even though I’m not really a ‘younger guy’.


18 posted on 02/26/2013 3:36:36 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; R. Scott; Terry Mross

Well, I’m not the authority on this, like I said I was just going by memory, my first military service was more than 40 years ago, and my last was more than 25 years ago.

I would be surprised if officially the military uses oh for zero, anywhere, but unofficially it may become common usage in some areas that are more relaxed.

Remember that occasionally you could run into a guy that used “tin hut” for “Attention!”, although I recall the Drill Sergeants efforts to eliminate that phrase in basic training.


19 posted on 02/26/2013 4:09:55 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nah Argo was great and the gist of the story is accurate. Just Hollywooded up.


20 posted on 02/26/2013 7:15:59 PM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

I’m sure it is a great work of fiction. Kind of like the Die Hard movies.


21 posted on 02/26/2013 7:17:23 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Here’s Joel Rosenberg’s take: http://flashtrafficblog.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/best-picture-goes-to-argo-bravo-its-the-first-serious-film-to-take-americans-inside-the-islamic-revolution-and-the-life-of-a-cia-team-trying-to-do-the-impossible/


22 posted on 02/27/2013 4:05:00 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I retired in 1986.
I tried to change from “Tin Hut” to “Attention”, I really did. It usually came out as “A ten hut”. My troops seemed to prefer the old style, being much snappier with it.


23 posted on 02/27/2013 4:57:04 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

In the Army, when I was in, the drill sergeants quickly tried to cure the recruits of what they had learned in movies in using ‘tin hut’ letting them know that it was a building, not a command.

I never used it in commands.


24 posted on 02/27/2013 11:10:40 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

A Ten Shun never had the punch as did A ten Hut.


25 posted on 02/27/2013 1:00:10 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I didn’t respect someone who would confuse tin hut with a command, and I never used it.


26 posted on 02/27/2013 1:06:32 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You were an officr?


27 posted on 02/27/2013 1:11:49 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Good Lord, what military were you in?

You think that one has to be an officer to move troops, or call formations to attention, or to command soldiers to attention?

How was basic training for you? Only officers called you to attention?


28 posted on 02/27/2013 1:35:33 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I was in the US Army from 1965 to 1986. Very seldom did officers drill the troops, the closest they came was when we’d have a pass in review parade. The only people I heard use “attention” were young officers and very young NCOs.
We seldom saw officers in Basic, they were only involved if major disciplinary action was needed.


29 posted on 02/28/2013 4:20:50 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Then I don’t know how you got confused about officers and calling people to attention, but my experience was different from yours, I would have laughed at you for yelling tin huts at me.


30 posted on 02/28/2013 7:58:04 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I would have laughed at you for yelling tin huts at me.

If you were in my formation you would only have laughed once. I was old school.

31 posted on 03/01/2013 5:26:00 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Only if you reported me to teacher, one on one I never ran into any issues with anyone in the army.

I did humiliate a few NCOs in my time and left a couple of officers frustrated and impotent, a simple and legal request to please be able to speak to the man in private about the issue, preferably in the woods across the street or elsewhere out of sight, while in front of the other troops, and that sincere plea always being rejected, was a clear message to the other soldiers, for officers the double entendre and veiled condescension would suffice to get them to avoid you if they were the kind who didn’t belong in their position.

Luckily most NCOs were of better quality and less bitchy than you sound, weak officers knew to avoid me, the military is strict and rule bound, but that kind of legalism is so easy to use to one’s benefit when humiliating a weak leader who is so thin-skinned and prissy as you sound.

You sound like the kind of guy who knew the sound of chuckling and snorts behind your back. Tin hut little buddy.

32 posted on 03/01/2013 10:55:52 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

So I was a traditionalist, live with it.


33 posted on 03/02/2013 5:00:24 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

A traditionalist was the man trying to cure you, you were weak and inadequate.


34 posted on 03/02/2013 11:34:37 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Weak and inadequate?
You claim to be a badass comedian Whoopee. I never had to resort to physical violence.


35 posted on 03/02/2013 2:18:11 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson