How would Comcast determine the act was unlawful? There is no evidence just accusation.
Comcast would be ill-advised to terminate based only on accusation. Is there any reason to think that's what this program is about?
Further the court determined that since there is no evidence that the worker was guilty of a crime (For if he was he would be in jail or on probation
LOL! That one isn't in jail or on probation shows only that the evidence was not beyond a reasonable doubt, not that it was nonexistent. Before you pontificate on legal points, you should familiarize yourself with such basics.
Ahhh in the criminal case the Case was thrown out BECAUSE THE DA COULD NOT PRODUCE EVIDENCE THE A CRIME WAS COMMITTED.
There was no reasonable doubt because there was no case hahahahh But hey keep on floundering Sparky.