Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 02/27/2013 11:32:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
From the article...
She, like Jackson, would be identified by the contempt she brings from the Eastern establishment’s salons and Hollywood, which still demands a say when the economic paradigm they speak for has shifted. Panic ensues. Systems degenerate. Seasoned writers become hacks. Artists become propagandists. Traditional “right” and “left” political distinctions become irrelevant. A new division occurs between “nationalists” and “federalists.”






2 posted on 02/28/2013 12:08:59 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The more "Blue-State Squeeze" I'm subjected to the less painful the financial hit seems when I contemplate selling my (slightly) under-water mortaged home to move to a Red State.

It really is becoming the tale of "two Americas" - and wondering if our nation may indeed split again - this time for a righteous cause.

5 posted on 02/28/2013 3:48:31 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have made this point that we cannot run another white male against the democrats/communists. The news media wants their democrat to run against another white male. The news media chose Romney for this reason (knocking out Palin, bacman, Cain etc). The news media will try to above all else choose a white male to be the Republican nominee( Christie or Jeb Bush is the liberal news media's fav). So I made the case for Sarah Palin . She would have obliterated the Obama monster even overcoming the voter fraud. The news media wants to portray the GOP as being only of white males (racist , women hating white males)

Sarah Palin for president of U.S. in 2016


6 posted on 02/28/2013 4:09:58 AM PST by Democrat_media (media makes mass shooters household names to create more & take our guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nationalists are not as easily turned into illuminati finger puppets like Feds are.


8 posted on 02/28/2013 5:31:46 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

Ping.


11 posted on 02/28/2013 5:35:30 AM PST by upchuck (nobama fact #69: For each job created by the nobama administration, 75 people went on food stamps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bernie Quigley doesn’t know what “nationalist” or “federalist” mean.
Federalism is shared powers between the states and Federal government. Nationalism is a belief system or political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a nation. The Federalists were nationalists in 1790 and federalists are today.

How is it that one can call the post-nationalists
and transnational coastal elites and their bases nationalist? These are demagogic anti-nationalists dirigists.


13 posted on 02/28/2013 4:00:54 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; sickoflibs

Palin ain’t gonna run for President and I doubt she’d win the nomination if she did. Not looking forward to 4 more years of empty wishing.


15 posted on 02/28/2013 9:47:43 PM PST by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The states of the old Confederacy boast 10 of the top 12 places for locating new plants, according to a recent 2012 study by Site Selection magazine.”

I don't know how many times I heard the phrase, "the South shall rise again", as a child. Little did I know that it was actually prophetic at the time.

Given the country's current socio/political/economic reality, I'm very thankful that I reside there now.

17 posted on 03/02/2013 12:20:55 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Traditional “right” and “left” political distinctions become irrelevant. A new division occurs between “nationalists” and “federalists.”

That is like the "Yankee and Cowboy Wars" scenario of the 70s and 80s.

But it doesn't really work in the way the author wants it to.

The "in" party promotes "nationalism" and the "out" party promotes "federalism" or "state's rights."

When the "ins" become the "outs" and vice versa it subverts a lot of the conclusions people came to based on the earlier scheme of things.

Conservatives in power are less keen on state's rights than conservatives out of power, and liberals out of power are less concerned with centralizing everything in Washington than they were when they were the "in party."

Of course conservatives in office may be less centralizing than liberals in office, and liberals out of office may be less decentralizing than conservatives out of office, but Bernie's version of things doesn't replace the familiar left versus right distinctions.

25 posted on 03/02/2013 1:51:06 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson