Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cape Cod community considers taking down wind turbines after illness, noise
foxnews.com ^ | 02/28/2013 | Molly Line

Posted on 02/28/2013 8:11:57 AM PST by massmike

Two wind turbines towering above the Cape Cod community of Falmouth, Mass., were intended to produce green energy and savings -- but they've created angst and division, and may now be removed at a high cost as neighbors complain of noise and illness.

"It gets to be jet-engine loud," said Falmouth resident Neil Andersen. He and his wife Betsy live just a quarter mile from one of the turbines. They say the impact on their health has been devastating. They're suffering headaches, dizziness and sleep deprivation and often seek to escape the property where they've lived for more than 20 years.

"Every time the blade has a downward motion it gives off a tremendous energy, gives off a pulse," said Andersen. "And that pulse, it gets into your tubular organs, chest cavity, mimics a heartbeat, gives you headaches. It's extremely disturbing and it gets to the point where you have to leave."

The first turbine went up in 2010 and by the time both were in place on the industrial site of the town's water treatment facility, the price was $10 million. Town officials say taking them down will cost an estimated $5 million to $15 million, but that is just what Falmouth's five selectmen have decided to move toward doing.

In the meantime, the turbines are being run on a limited schedule as the selectmen respond to the concerns of nearby neighbors. The turbines only run during the day -- from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. -- which means they're operating at a loss.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: capecod; capegodless; coal; electricity; electricitygraphs; greenenergy; kennedycorruption; massachusetts; natgas; windpower; windturbines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 02/28/2013 8:12:03 AM PST by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

And what do they think will replace the turbines to treat their water? Coal or oil burning power plants! While that area usually is characterized as a bunch of Limousine Libs, they obviously are, in reality, rich, greedy Republicans who hate the environment.


2 posted on 02/28/2013 8:15:17 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
the price was $10 million. Town officials say taking them down will cost an estimated $5 million to $15 million

Wow, that's quite an...um..."savings".

Even under the best circumstances they'll still need to be replaced every 15 to 20 years at ever greater "savings".
3 posted on 02/28/2013 8:18:57 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The tree hugger “green” people know how to make you sick at great price!!!


4 posted on 02/28/2013 8:19:49 AM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
after illness, noise

not to mention all the dead seagulls that they have to clean up.

5 posted on 02/28/2013 8:20:39 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
they're operating at a loss

And that's probably after all sorts of subsidies as well as the town's taxpayer money.

Those things are horrible. The jerks over at North Haven in Penobscot Bay put one of those up, right in one of the most beautiful and historic parts of the islands, and you can see it from all over the bay.

I've said from the start that this will be just like all those dams. First they built them everywhere for clean energy, and then they started tearing them down--for the fishes. The windmills will go for the sake of the birds, if not the nearby people.

But, first they have to put them all up, at enormous expense.

6 posted on 02/28/2013 8:21:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
the price was $10 million. Town officials say taking them down will cost an estimated $5 million to $15 million...

Surely the source of Solyndra-like Taxpayer-Green-energy-borrowed/printed money that paid for the POS, will now chip in to remove it.... right?

7 posted on 02/28/2013 8:21:10 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco

NIMBY...
NAMBY...
a and
BANNAA!!

Wonder how many here know whatr those terms mean??


8 posted on 02/28/2013 8:22:58 AM PST by Rca2000 ( Still too shocked to have a tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: danamco

NIMBY...
NAMBY...
a and
BANNAA!!

Wonder how many here know whatr those terms mean??


9 posted on 02/28/2013 8:23:33 AM PST by Rca2000 ( Still too shocked to have a tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

Sorry for the double post, slow, intermittent inetenet here at work!! Moderator—please remove onf of the double posts!!


10 posted on 02/28/2013 8:26:33 AM PST by Rca2000 ( Still too shocked to have a tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: massmike

“And that pulse, it gets into your tubular organs”

What the heck are “tubular organs”?


11 posted on 02/28/2013 8:28:07 AM PST by History Repeats (sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Opinionated Blowhard
Coal or oil burning power plants!

It won't be an oil burning power plant. Maybe Natural Gas but nobody except very remote or otherwise infrastructure limited areas are going to put in a normally run (not just a backup) oil burning power plant.

Some new plants are designed to run on petroleum coke, the solid, coal-like substance leftover from crude oil after the valuable fuels like gasoline and diesel have been removed. Much of the power plants listed as petroleum fueled are actually burning petroleum coke. Even then, it is very few.


13 posted on 02/28/2013 8:30:14 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: History Repeats

The crazy ones.


14 posted on 02/28/2013 8:32:09 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Windmill maker gets Federal kickbacks. Windmills installed at price. Windmills UNinstalled at a price. Local politicians get greased while taxpayers get hosed. I’d say those windmills did EXACTLY what they were intended to do.


15 posted on 02/28/2013 8:33:51 AM PST by 762X51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

A useful graph. It should maybe note that renewables on the chart does also include Hydropower. The growth in that category is from the solar wind etc, but the baseline is hydropower dams, built by the government two or three generation ago.


16 posted on 02/28/2013 8:34:58 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Liberals.

Science is not their friend.

Math is not their friend.

Economics is not their friend.

Actually, I cannot think of any non-felon committing human who is their friend.


17 posted on 02/28/2013 8:45:58 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
A useful graph. It should maybe note that renewables on the chart does also include Hydropower.

The renewables on the chart does include hydropower. Hydropower supplies the majority of the renewables category.

Source:
How much of our electricity is generated from renewable energy?
http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/renewable_electricity.cfm

18 posted on 02/28/2013 8:47:46 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: massmike

common sense could have prevented this waste to the taxpayers. as an avid environmentalist concerned with true stewardship of our resources and who works in the green industry it is my honest opinion that this technology, as is solar, is not to the point we can truly use it as a viable long term resources. However, geothermal, hydro are and we should be pushing resources in that direction. We need a conservative candidate who will push hard on green issues - true stewardship thru such as avenues. Where are they? They have to exist? If you know any please post. We are commanded by God to be stewards of the planet He gifted us. This is clearly a conservative cause that his been corrupted by the marxists.


19 posted on 02/28/2013 8:48:51 AM PST by Deathtomarxists (Pantyhose are groovy baby, try some on today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
To better illustrate your point:


20 posted on 02/28/2013 8:50:14 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson