Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone pipeline passes environmental review – ‘little impact on climate’ – ecos outraged
Watts Up With That? ^ | March 1, 2013 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 03/01/2013 9:18:16 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: TigersEye

41 posted on 03/02/2013 5:45:32 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Look at the map of enclosed Keystone pipeline, then look at a map of the routes that the oil tankers take to deliver a comparable amount of oil from the various Middle East producers.

Here’s a one-question quiz for the enviro-idiots:

Which system has the least environmental impact?


42 posted on 03/02/2013 6:02:06 AM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune just released the following reaction in a press release just sent out:

“The Sierra Club is outraged by the State Department’s deeply flawed analysis today and what can only be interpreted as lip service to one of the greatest threats to our children’s future: climate disruption…”

I’m sorry to say Michael you are a narrow minded fool.

In this country today the greatest danger to our children’s future is the poverty that will be caused by an economic collapse.

Our country is on the verge of such an economic collapse caused by a government that is spending far more money than the crippled private sector can provide.

The only hope that this country has in avoiding that economic collapse is a recovery that can only be fueled by cheap energy.

Energy is at the root of every product produced by the private sector. Energy refines iron, shapes iron, produces plastics, shapes plastic, purifies water, makes light, powers motors, charges batteries, moves truck and cars. If man made it, he used energy to make it and get it to where you see it.

A reduction in the cost of energy would reduce the price of all goods and services. This reduction in prices would lead to increases in demand for goods and service that would kick start the economy leading to higher employment rates that will reduce welfare rolls, unemployment payments and to an influx of revenue to the government.

I can think of no other thing that can accomplish the turnaround that this country must have to avoid economic collapse. Tax cuts alone just won’t do it at this point.

The United States is an energy rich country. If we do not exploit those riches and as a consequence suffer the economic collapse that causes the poverty and civil strife that economic collapse that will ensue from such a collapse we will have people like you Michael to blame.

43 posted on 03/02/2013 6:13:22 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Once again the Envirusmentalist wackos are not actually interested in protecting the environment, but to fullfill a political agenda to destroy America's productive power.

They are " Envirusmentalist "
44 posted on 03/02/2013 11:54:07 AM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
OPPSSSSS ! the truth comes out, the Canadian oil sands is actually helping the environment. " the oil sands operations are cleaning up one of the world’s biggest oil spills. The stuff has been oozing into the Athabaska River for millenia before even the indians immigrated to the area. "

And by us extracting oil from the oceans we are actually protecting the environment in case a big earthquake opens up the ocean floor and spews out tons and tons of oil in one day.
45 posted on 03/02/2013 11:57:46 AM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hey Enviruses ?

If God didn't intend for us to use oil he would not have put the oil there in the ground and given us the intelligence to develope ways to use it.

God said, be fruitfull and multiply and fill the earth... in other words ? God said to be productive in multible ways along with procreation.

Ernest ? this post is not dirrected at you, it's towards the ENVIRUSES... they are a deadly plague.

Coal can be used properly and be developed to burn clean.
46 posted on 03/02/2013 12:11:59 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I wish someone with a whole lot of money produce a hour long documenty to re-educate the public and remind the public of the enviruses lies, tricks, and deceit.


47 posted on 03/02/2013 12:15:29 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
No matter, doesn't matter what the enviruses want, it's what God's will is.

God's will from the beginning was for us to be fruitfull, to multiply and fill the whole earth... and to take control and rule over the earth.
God's will, well ? will be done, here on earth as it is in heaven.
No one can stop God's will to be accomplish no matter what the envirses think.
To be " Fruitfull " is more than just procreation.
Being fruitfull is what fruit trees do, they produce.
Fruitfull means in it' basic form, to be productive.
48 posted on 03/02/2013 12:21:48 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
" The United States is an energy rich country. If we do not exploit those riches and as a consequence suffer the economic collapse that causes the poverty and civil strife that economic collapse that will ensue from such a collapse we will have people like you Michael to blame. "

Then we will have a " Social Environmental " disaster... then again ? perhaps ? that's what they want after all ?
49 posted on 03/02/2013 12:29:50 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

That term “secured the retirement of coal plants” is enviro-speak for “forced the closure of...”.


50 posted on 03/02/2013 12:34:41 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
I’m sorry to say Michael you are a narrow minded fool.

No, I think instead he is a money-grubbing liar. I'm sure he makes a handsome living perpetrating this massive hoax.

51 posted on 03/02/2013 12:47:42 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
No, I think instead he is a money-grubbing liar. I'm sure he makes a handsome living perpetrating this massive hoax.

You may have a point but only a man with no love for his country would make his daily bred to the determent of his native land.

I would rather think a man a fool than to think he was such a man.

52 posted on 03/02/2013 1:38:50 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

The “enviruses” don’t seem to want to accept that basic command. :)


53 posted on 03/02/2013 2:15:42 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
That's because they are all part of a larger cult that is anti-God and anti-Christ.
The feminist ? anti-God, anti-bible, anti-man, anti-procreation.
Enviruses ? anti-procreation, anti-productive, anti-mankind rules this earth.
54 posted on 03/02/2013 10:27:29 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Understand.


55 posted on 03/03/2013 8:48:28 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

My husband is on the Marine Transportation committee that is doing the re-evaluation of the shipping end of the coal terminal. A big part of the problem is that the push for the coal terminal is coming straight out of the White House and you know what that means for WA State. It means the fix is in and it will be really difficult to stop it. It is possible, though. There is some talk that the Longview and Oregon terminals may get passed, but not the Whatcom County terminal. We will see. The unions are putting a lot of pressure on both parties and In Whatcom County, most of our politicians have union ties, if not themselves, their wives.

The coal pushers keep telling us that the coal trains will come anyway, but that just isn’t the case. The planned expansion of the Canadian coal terminals is not intended for moving U.S. sub-bituminous coal, but rather Canadian coal. Constant coal trains, traveling the whole coast of WA is just not a very attractive idea, not good for the health and well-being of the the communities along the way, to say nothing of the negative economic impact. The most heavily impacted community will be my own, nearest the proposed terminal, where they plan to do next to nothing to protect the community from the coal dust.


56 posted on 03/04/2013 8:27:01 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This will make Ed Baglady Jr. jump off a high windmill.


57 posted on 03/07/2013 8:29:12 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson