[MrB]

If they can call an AR-15 an “assault rifle” for emotional effect,

we damn sure can call these things “tanks”.

Nothing a citizen can legally posess can penetrate the armor, so it might as well be a “tank”.

[MachIV]

Is the Barrett in 50bmg off limits to citizens without class 3?

[Free Vulcan]

.50 cal and 20MM?

[Wurlitzer]

“Nothing a citizen can legally posess can penetrate the armor, so it might as well be a “tank”.”

---

Based upon the original intent of the Founders, we MUST have the right to possess arms equal in strength to what our own government is willing to use against us. They did not limit arms to muskets, knives, slingshots... for a reason. They were brilliant. They knew fully well, thanks to history, the tendency of governments to abuse power and to use the current weapons of the day against their own people.

For ARMS to be used for original intent you cannot limit citizens to little fire sticks with 10 (7 in NYS) projectiles.

This is a government preparing to shred the remainder of the US Constitution and in the words of the great monkey’s friend, Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers stated ... killing 25 million Americans that would not bend to their political will... “Innocent people have to die in a revolution.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Anyone remember when BILL CLINTON gave the LAPD two thousand full automatic M-16s? He later sent large numbers of bayonets to the LAPD.

[Paladin2]

Yep, a Death Panel Tank coming to serve you.

[itsahoot]

Nothing a citizen can legally posess can penetrate the armor, so it might as well be a “tank”.

Thank you MrB, for bringing a little reality into the discussion.

If Freepers refuse to wake up and smell the coffee we truly are in deep dodo.

Some may recall I believed from the outset, that if he was elected, he had no intention of leaving office.