Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; Lurking Libertarian
The law ought to have banned oral, anal, and --- who knows? --- nasal sodomy for everyone without distinction, but unfortunately it did not.

The quote: The statute at issue here makes sodomy a crime only if a person “engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.” Tex. Penal Code Ann. §21.06(a) (2003).

Scroll down to where the text is highlighted in yellow: Law TextLink

It should prohibit intentionally (deliberately) depositing seminal fluid anywhere but in one's lawful wife's vagina, but it did not.

As for the lesbians, what they do is morally objectionable as well, but has far less impact on public health, and so arguably is a less fit subject for regulation by public policy. I would still oppose valorizing their disorder by fraudulently calling it marriage.

23 posted on 03/05/2013 9:51:30 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
It should prohibit intentionally (deliberately) depositing seminal fluid anywhere but in one's lawful wife's vagina, but it did not.

Good luck getting such a law passed. There's not one state legislature anywhere in the U.S. that would pass such a law.

24 posted on 03/05/2013 10:31:30 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson