Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona argues it can deny driver's licenses to deferred-action migrants
Arizona Daily Star ^ | Howard Fischer | Capital Media Services

Posted on 03/05/2013 10:32:40 AM PST by SandRat

PHOENIX - Attorneys for Gov. Jan Brewer told a federal judge Monday there is no legal basis to order the state to provide driver's licenses to certain illegal immigrants immediately, since they are not being harmed.

Douglas Northup, the lead counsel for the governor and the state Department of Transportation, said those who qualify for the Obama administration's "deferred action" program want U.S. District Judge David Campbell to require the state to issue licenses, even before the case goes to trial. The governor directed ADOT last year not to give licenses to those granted the right to remain in this country and work here under the program.

Northup said the challengers based their arguments on the idea that immigrants' inability to get a license hinders the ability to work and function as fully participating members of society.

But in legal pleadings Monday, Northup noted, "The individual plaintiffs are getting to work, school and going about their daily lives without driver's licenses and without serious impediment." Northup told the judge there is no reason to believe anything will change if he does not issue the injunction.

"They generally plan to continue doing exactly what they are doing now," Northup wrote. And he said without irreparable harm, the judge cannot summarily order the state to issue driver's licenses.

But the lawyers representing the five individuals challenging Brewer's directive said the program, known formally as Deferred Action Childhood Arrival, does authorize them and others similarly situated to be in the country. That, they argued, makes Brewer's action illegal and requires Campbell to overturn it.

In their own legal filings Monday, the challengers made some attacks of their own. They argued that Brewer has failed to show the policy of denying driver's licenses to those in the program was based on any real or legitimate state interest.

"The record evidence confirms that defendants issued their policy based on the impermissible purpose of singling out a politically unpopular group for differential treatment," wrote Nicholas Espiritu for those challenging the governor.

A court hearing is slated for later this month for Campbell to decide whether he should immediately order the state to start issuing licenses to the potentially 80,000 Arizonans who are eligible for deferred action.

Central to the debate is a 1996 Arizona law that says those seeking a state license must show their presence is "authorized under federal law."

The program, unveiled last summer, says the federal government will not try to deport those who arrived before age 18, are not yet 30 and meet certain other conditions. That status is good for two years, renewable infinitely.

It also provides work authorization cards to those who ultimately qualify.

Brewer contends the deferred action program announced last year by the Obama administration does not authorize anyone to be in the United States but simply says they will not be deported, at least for the time being.

On Monday, Northup went a bit further. He does not contend the program is illegal, conceding Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has the authority to grant deferred action. But he said that does not give the program the force of law.

"It serves only as a general guide and advises federal agents how to exercise their discretionary power to prosecute federal immigration law," Northup wrote. He said federal policy cannot invalidate state laws.

Northup also said that Homeland Security officials have said deferred action does not require states to provide driver's licenses but instead leaves that issue up to each state.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: activists; aliens; cars; illegals

1 posted on 03/05/2013 10:32:55 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: SandRat

Maybe illegals could get CA drivers licences and use them in AZ, although car registration could be a problem.


3 posted on 03/05/2013 10:44:50 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to Dems and Obama is not a principle! Its just losing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Boy! When Tennessee was controlled by the Democrats, illegals were issued driver’s licenses. Our local driver’s license office was just packed from morning to night. You couldn’t get in to do any business whatsoever. I’d had laser surgery and needed to get in to have my restrictions reflect that; but it was useless to even try. You’d be there for hours, and still not get in. - I’m sure that was the way it was all over the state. - Then last year when I finally had to renew my license, I got a hateful state employee evidently bent on giving me my comeuppance. By that time, the letter the laser surgeon had given me was outdated, and he’d since closed up shop and retired. - State worker informed me I’d get a BIG ticket if I drove without my glasses. I just said, “That’ll be okay.” - turned on my heel and left. So far, so good. - Now, of course, glasses are a hindrance to me. (Republicans took over for the first time since Reconstruction a couple of years ago. The illegal’s license takeover stopped suddenly.)


4 posted on 03/05/2013 10:45:27 AM PST by Twinkie (JOHN 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

I am actually ok with licensing illegal aliens with some conditions, the main one being the requirement that illegals be issued a license that is stamped “alien”, is accompanied by a full set of finger prints to be done at the DMV and is accompanied by a prepaid insurance policy. Just see how many illegals allow themselves to be finger printed. I would be that the number of applications would drop off significantly and of course the alien licenses would not include motor voter registration.


5 posted on 03/05/2013 10:56:40 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

:: singling out a politically unpopular group ::

Ummmm, no.

They violated federal law to be here. They are felons.

Again, DLs are a State conferred priviledge recognized by other states. There is no FEDERAL intrusion allowed.


6 posted on 03/05/2013 10:58:02 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (*Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Obama’s war with Arizona continues.


7 posted on 03/05/2013 11:07:44 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Direct assault on US sovereignty. As far as this goes, the US government is actively aiding an abetting an enemy foreign agressor. This means that mexico is open to enemy agression by US citizens, which means that we can go down there and plunder and pillage with impunity, and the US government isn’t going to stop us. If that’s the case, then the drug cartels are going to be the least of mexico’s worries. This is what the open border crowd fears the most. Your illegals will soon become refugees, and them you’ll really have to pay for them.


8 posted on 03/05/2013 11:32:36 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Easy Solution, if a Federal Judge orders AZ to issue licenses to ILLEGALS, the State needs to immediately pass a Law making All Federal Employees within the Boundaries of the State of AZ to be Civilly Liable for any and all injuries or Losses as a result. Attach their Wages and if it isn’t enough SEIZE THEIR ASSETS, using the KELO Decision as their basis for doing so. The Court has already approved the seizing of Personal Assets and personal Property for Economic Gain. Now make them Live with it.


9 posted on 03/06/2013 5:17:25 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson