Skip to comments.
Talk show host Vicki McKenna says proposed rules on bullets would essentially ban deer hunting
Milwaukee J-S ^
| 11 mar 2013
Posted on 03/11/2013 5:15:11 AM PDT by rellimpank
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
---another example of the complete unthinking ignorance of certain members of the criminal conspiracy that masquerades as a political party---
To: rellimpank
It has nothing to do with crime. It has and always will be about disarming the American people.
To: rellimpank
Maybe it’s not unthinking ignorance; maybe it’s malignant evil.
3
posted on
03/11/2013 5:23:00 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: rellimpank
Ignorant people passing stupid laws. You can expect them to get upset about FMJ rounds next, they will be "armor piercing".
The idiots simply can't grasp the technology they are trying to regulate.
4
posted on
03/11/2013 5:23:03 AM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: rellimpank
Its not “unthinking ignorance”, they know exactly what they are doing.
5
posted on
03/11/2013 5:24:22 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
To: rellimpank
You mean those nasty bullets the Government just bought almost 2 Billion of for “target practice”.
7
posted on
03/11/2013 5:29:31 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: driftdiver; All
I think it is “Goldilocks gun control”. That gun is too small, that gun is too big, those bullet expand too much, those do not expand at all...
None of them are “just right”.
8
posted on
03/11/2013 5:32:34 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
To: marktwain
Nicely put, their goal is to ban private ownership of firearms. EVERYTHING they do is a step in that direction.
9
posted on
03/11/2013 5:34:15 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
They'll probably be coming for these "weapons of mass destruction" next.
10
posted on
03/11/2013 5:36:29 AM PDT
by
deoetdoctrinae
(The Old White Flag Republicans can go straight to He// and take their pal Obama with them!)
To: riverrunner
Gotta hate knee-jerk politics. The special domain of the mentally unstable left.
To: afraidfortherepublic
12
posted on
03/11/2013 5:47:18 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: rellimpank
The feigned ignorance is a ruse. They want to “accidentally” ban each and every bullet and weapon, one at a time.
Any person who has any respect for individual rights who ever votes for a Democrat (or anti-gun Republican) should have his head examined.
13
posted on
03/11/2013 5:50:43 AM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(If you have a right / To the service I provide / I must be your slave)
To: rellimpank
I don’t use or need hollow points for deer hunting (unless soft point counts) but, I DO for self defense.
14
posted on
03/11/2013 5:54:45 AM PDT
by
WCH
To: WCH
This bill prohibits a person, with certain exceptions such as
for law enforcement, from selling, transporting, manufacturing, or possessing any hollow point bullet,
any bullet that expands or flattens easily in the human body, or any bullet with a hard envelope that does not entirely cover the core of the bullet.
http://mediatrackers.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/LRB-08941.pdf
15
posted on
03/11/2013 6:03:59 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: driftdiver
Its not unthinking ignorance, they know exactly what they are doing....
You are so right. People are not stupid. They have their own agenda and progressing on it step by step.
It looks moronic to us but we are measuring them by our standards. Measuring by their standards, they are hero’s and geniuses.
16
posted on
03/11/2013 6:04:36 AM PDT
by
Hang'emAll
(If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?)
To: DuncanWaring
The quote about never attributing to malice that which can be explained by incompetence
is incomplete.
The rest of it is “but never rule out malice”.
17
posted on
03/11/2013 6:06:16 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: rellimpank
Yeah, that’ll go over well with the hunters in the northern counties.
These dems are overreaching. Give ‘em just enough rope.
18
posted on
03/11/2013 6:06:42 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
To: driftdiver
I keep burning with the question of “WHY! WHY is no one calling them on exactly what they want to do?”
Why is no one saying “You’re not fooling anyone, you want to disarm the citizenry, AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE?”
19
posted on
03/11/2013 6:07:48 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: thackney
Well there ya go.
This could include all bullets when worded like that.
20
posted on
03/11/2013 6:08:14 AM PDT
by
WCH
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson