Posted on 03/16/2013 3:59:36 AM PDT by IbJensen
He sides with the flawed and phony philosopher, Peter Singer. Singer, an animal lover, claims that because human reason doesn't begin until about the age 6 or 7, that a child is not a human person. He made this argument to protect animals from slaughter, as they had no reasoning intellect. He believed that if we can kill pigs, then we can kill children before the age of 6.
The atheists have become tired of being ignored and are becoming more militant and they see the trouble that the militant homosexuals and their sycophants (chief sycophant being the phony, unqualified marxist president) are causing.
Amazing, rejecting science for a moral argument, when he claims to have based all on science. Same twisting of logic for homosexual marriage supporters.
Had Dawkins mother know her childs disabiliteys she would have aborted him.
How human is Dawkins vis-a-vis an adult pig and of what greater utility is he, in his own estimation?
I guess Dawkins is the practitioner of some weird, Eastern religion? One that doesn’t believe in concepts like DNA?
The religion of Darwinism teaches the belief that pigs and humans are relatives which share a common ancestor.
There is no religion of Darwinism. Your statement is ludicrous.
Darwinism is a religious belief that cannot be proved scientifically. Dawkins thinks that because human fetuses look kind of like pig fetuses, that proves that humans are related to pigs. It’s a primitive and fanatical belief system which does not tolerate any criticism of its dogma.
Is an adult dog or an adult pig more human?
Obvious to me that folks like Dawkins don’t feel pain ~
Alexander Tsiaras vs. Richard Dawkins. Who's the dumb one?
Dawkins aside, your Darwin statement is absolute balderdash. Drivelous nonsense
So a baby being carried by a black woman is less human than a pig, Richard?
That was so cool!
A basic course in Aristotelian logic wouldn't hurt.
I am not familiar with Dawkins, or what he is alledged to be a doctor of.
I have a problem with so many people actually listening to the ramblings of a fool.
This man obviously has the intelligence of a Oragutan, and probably the good looks.
Dawkins is evil. It is not enough for him to believe what he wants to believe, he has to be a rude, mean, bully to everyone else.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.