Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Nanofabrication Technique Doubles Hard Drive Capacity
MIT Technology Review ^ | 03-19-13 | By Mike Orcutt

Posted on 03/20/2013 9:09:20 AM PDT by Red Badger

Laboratory advance shows that nano-imprinting could help the hard drive industry meet its long-term goals for data storage capacity.

Researchers at HGST, a major manufacturer of hard disk drives, have shown that an emerging fabrication technology called nano-imprinting could be used to double the data storage capacity of today’s hard disks. They say the patent-pending work, done in collaboration with a company called Molecular Imprints, could lead to a cost-effective manufacturing process by the end of the decade.

Hard disk drives store data in magnetic material on the surface of a spinning disk. During production, this material is deposited as a thin film. Information is then written to the disk by changing the magnetic orientation of distinct individual units of the material, known as “grains.” A group of grains together make up a region that can store a single bit. Since the 1950s, when the technology was invented, hard disk manufacturers have continually found ways to keep increasing data storage capacity by reducing the area required to store a bit, most recently by using fewer and fewer clustered grains for each.

Now the industry is running up against limits to this strategy, partly because the particles’ magnetism becomes less stable when they are very small, a phenomenon known as superparamagnetism. “If I take a permanent magnet and I make it small enough, it becomes nonmagnetic,” explains Currie Munce, vice president of HGST Research.

There are also physical limits how small the recording regions can be. “If you continue to try to push these magnetized areas closer and closer together, they finally reach a point where they can feel their neighbors to such an extent that they have a tendency to flip over,” explains Grant Willson, a materials science professor at the University of Texas at Austin. That causes data loss. Willson is a cofounder of Molecular Imprints, although he was not involved in this research.

Researchers have known for years that patterning a disk with physically isolated, nanoscopic magnetic dots makes it possible to pack in more information than applying the material as a continuous film. The challenge has been developing an economical way to manufacture disks with the precise nanoscopic patterns in the circular tracks needed for the recording head to do its work.

The HGST researchers announced at last month’s SPIE advanced lithography meeting that they had used their proprietary nano-imprinting process to pattern a disk substrate with 10-nanometer-wide dots, closely packed and in circular tracks. They showed that a recording head can read and write information from these dots, and they reported that their process could print 1.2 trillion “magnetic islands” per square inch—enough to store about a terabyte on a 2.5-inch disk, which is double the capacity of today’s devices. (The most spacious drive currently sold by HGST can store four terabytes of data.) Since the dots can be made even smaller, the method would in theory allow for several more generations of capacity gains.

Nano-imprinting, a technique that first emerged in the mid-1990s, consists of applying a soft material to a surface and then stamping it with a hard material covered with specific patterns. The resulting imprints then guide modification to the surface, such as etching or deposition of additional material. The soft material is then removed, leaving only the new designs on the original surface. The magnetic recording and semiconductor industries both view the technique as a promising solution to the puzzle of how to reliably manufacture structures and patterns smaller than about 20 or 30 nanometers.

To design their stamp, the HGST researchers used molecules called block copolymers, which can be engineered to line up in repeating patterns on a treated surface—a technique called “directed self-assembly.” “We think we can implement [the process] in manufacturing,” says Munce.

HGST’s engineers will also focus on making the dots as small as physically possible (See “Fabrication Trick Offers Fivefold Leap in Hard Drive Capacity”). Munce says around 15 or 20 years from now they will run up against another size limit. By then, he says, provided several further refinements to the technology, “I may have bought myself another factor of 20 in capacity gains.”

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: computers; data; harddrive; hgst; memory

Data dots: Researchers at HGST created the pattern above, which contains “magnetic islands” for storing data, using an emerging technique called nanoimprinting.

1 posted on 03/20/2013 9:09:20 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Tech Ping!........

2 posted on 03/20/2013 9:09:41 AM PDT by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Give me SSD any day. I’ve been converted. I love spinning disk for total disk, but for speed, SSD is the way to go.

Perhaps we’ll see 10 TB disks in the near future.

3 posted on 03/20/2013 9:19:50 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Perhaps we’ll see 10 TB disks in the near future.

10 TB is a LOT of Bay Watch reruns. Somehow I don't see the point for most home users.

4 posted on 03/20/2013 9:39:23 AM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

When you include all the “Baywatch Nights” episodes, it really adds up.

5 posted on 03/20/2013 9:42:17 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

They need to do something about density. The next big idea is helium gas in drive housings to quadruple capacity but we are running out of that.

HDD has been amazingly resilient vs the Solid State Storage offensive. My only problem with SSD is relatively short lifetime of each bit. My next work computer will be SSD and I’m looking forward to it.

6 posted on 03/20/2013 9:45:35 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Holographic memory was supposed to be the next best thing. Lots of redundancy in case the medium was damaged.

7 posted on 03/20/2013 10:27:01 AM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson