Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Sobering Results for Malaria Vaccine
ScienceNOW ^ | 20 March 2013 | Gretchen Vogel

Posted on 03/21/2013 6:05:17 PM PDT by neverdem

Enlarge Image
sn-malaria.jpg
Dampened hopes. Ally Olotu (right) with a malaria vaccine trial participant and his mother. New results show that the vaccine's protection wanes over time.
Credit: John-Michael Maas/Darby Communications

There is more cautionary news for the world's most advanced malaria vaccine. A new study in Kenyan children shows that its protection wanes over time, dropping to near zero after 4 years. The results, published in tomorrow's issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, are another strike against the chances that the vaccine will be widely used in its current form.

The vaccine, called RTS,S, is the only one ever to be tested in a phase III clinical trial. That trial reported promising initial results in 2011, cutting rates of malaria by half in toddlers. But findings published in November clouded its prospects, as the vaccine failed to protect young babies as much as hoped.

RTS,S (the name is an abbreviation of the protein components in the vaccine) was developed in the late 1980s by researchers at GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals in Rixensart, Belgium, and later in partnership with the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative. It contains an engineered protein that combines a protein fragment from the Plasmodium falciparum parasite and a protein from the hepatitis B virus, which helps provoke a strong immune response. Phase II trials in Kenya and elsewhere suggested that the vaccine cut rates of malaria by roughly half. Based on those findings, researchers launched the ambitious phase III trial involving more than 15,000 children at 11 sites in seven countries across sub-Saharan Africa. Although the interim outcomes published last fall were disappointing, the study is still ongoing, with full results expected in 2014.

In the meantime, Ally Olotu, Philip Bejon, and their colleagues at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kilifi, Kenya, continued to follow the nearly 450 children in the phase II trial. Now, they report that in the 223 kids who received the vaccine, protection fades over time and is almost completely gone after 4 years. They also found that the pattern differs in areas of higher and lower malaria transmission: In the former, protection faded even faster, disappearing after about 2 years. Olotu and Bejon say that might be because the control group—which was carefully observed and treated for any malaria cases that appeared—developed natural immunity more quickly in the areas of higher transmission.

The news is not all dim. Because so many children get malaria in the region and many get it multiple times, the researchers calculated that for every 100 children vaccinated, 65 cases of malaria were prevented. That suggests that decisions about whether and how to use the potentially expensive vaccine will be complex, Bejon says.

"This shows again that the vaccine has its limitations," says Robert Sauerwein, a malaria vaccine researcher at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center in the Netherlands. Although researchers will gain valuable insights from the ongoing trials, "it shows we have to do better." Ultimately, RTS,S will likely be used in combination with other vaccine components in a second-generation vaccine, says malaria vaccine researcher Adrian Hill of the Jenner Institute at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Sauerwein agrees. RTS,S "is definitely not a big tool, but it's a small tool," he says. "We can't afford to throw any tool away."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: malaria; malariavaccine; rtssvaccine; vaccinertss

1 posted on 03/21/2013 6:05:17 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We already had an effective tool... it’s called DDT. Thank you Rachel Carson, you killed more people than Mao and Stalin combined.


2 posted on 03/21/2013 6:56:32 PM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

At what cost? The extinction of every bird species on the planet? Then what you gonna do? Oh, I know. Even MORE man-made chemicals because the ones we’re using now aren’t killing off life on this planet fast enough.


3 posted on 03/21/2013 7:07:38 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That trial reported promising initial results in 2011, cutting rates of malaria by half in toddlers. But findings published in November clouded its prospects, as the vaccine failed to protect young babies as much as hoped.

Disappointing to be sure, because it was hoped that it would stop all, or almost all, of the malaria cases. But my goodness, it works to a large extent. Malaria is very difficult to treat in the youngest population because they cannot communicate to us when the disease is in the early stages. Often, treatment isn't given them until the malaria is advanced and that makes it very hard to treat. Also, many strains are drug-resistant. Those drugs that are available are rough on children (quinine is rough on adults and malarone should NEVER be given to anyone anywhere!).

Perhaps this drug isn't everything hoped for but it does seem to be better than what is available now.

And no one can walk around with a malaria net covering them.

4 posted on 03/21/2013 7:54:24 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mother Abigail; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe; null and void; grey_whiskers; ...
Engineered immune cells battle acute leukaemia - Modified T cells seek out and destroy blood cancer.

Most of Earth covered with life powered on hydrogen. Living Rocks?

FReepmail me if you want on or off my combined microbiology/immunology ping list.

5 posted on 03/21/2013 8:01:14 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus
We already had an effective tool... it’s called DDT.

Look up mosquitoes and DDT resistance.

6 posted on 03/21/2013 8:05:45 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Exactly, chessplayers. Birds are disappearing, bee colonies are collapsing, and that’s ok with too many people. Shortsighted.


7 posted on 03/21/2013 8:07:26 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely expressed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

DDT is not the proven cause of egg shell thinning.


8 posted on 03/22/2013 4:11:48 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Sparticus

DDT is still an effective tool, despite some resistance in certain malarial vectors. It can be painted onto huts thereby reducing the at home vector. Let’s not exaggerate the risk.


9 posted on 03/22/2013 4:15:32 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson