Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
I am aware of libertarians and their disagreement with consent laws and in preventing sex with children and posted proof of it in post 82, but you claim that a “”A vastly larger number of Republicans” want to end the age of consent and call incest laws unconstitutional? I am calling you a liar and would like to see you post the proof.

I posted at 68 right from the LP platform that declares "Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs. This statement shall not be construed to condone child abuse or neglect."

Clearly this indicates that the Parent-Child relationship is protected and you crazy notion that libertarians think consent and incest laws would be repealed is baseless. A handful of loudmouth liberal gays attempting to corrupt libertarian precepts to their own agenda cannot condemn libertarian principles at all. As stated before, Bill Mahar called himself a libertarian but is clearly a Socialist Fascist liar using the Saul Alinsky tactic of hijacking a trendy word(libertarian) to confuse and deceive. You need to quit helping him.

146 posted on 03/27/2013 8:51:14 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister

Read that statement, as a parent you can do what you want, have whatever moral codes you want, or sexual ideas that you want, but “This statement shall not be construed to condone child abuse or neglect.” is bland and non-committal or defined.

Nothing is defined, or prevented, it is vague and meaningless coming from the people who also took this actual action which demonstrates where the ideology of sexual perversion (libertarianism) is on the question of NAMBLA and child sex.

“Ruwart wrote. “When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.”

“”Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take — a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind. It’s also political poison. As libertarian blogger Steve Newton put it, Ruwart and her allies run the risk of turning the party into “the poster child for NAMBLA and the aluminum hat brigade.”

The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws. Cory resigned in protest, depriving a party in the midst of what may be its most promising election season of one of its most able organizers and fund raisers. But for many libertarian faithful, adherence to the most rigid of principles always trumps practical considerations about how those principles might be more broadly observed.””


149 posted on 03/27/2013 9:12:53 PM PDT by ansel12 (" I would not be in the United States Senate if it wasnt for Sarah Palin " Cruz said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson