Yup, these started appearing:
Later yesterday, a friend posted this as a counter:
I made sure I shared it on my FB page and kept my profile photo in place of my wife and I.
Posted on 03/27/2013 5:30:13 AM PDT by 1010RD
I don't know who funded this guy and his research, but every adult that has any contact with children has remarked about the influence the parent has on a child.
We know illiterate parents are incapable of assisting with a child's education, thus pretty much guaranteeing a small vocabulary and the accompanying et cetera's.
I've met countless kids that can't form words correctly because the parents (yeah .. single moms .. ) are uneducated and speak with lazy tongues and the usual et cetera's.
So now we're told of a study that if daddy and daddy ... or mommy and mommy speak to their pweshus baby in a faggoty manner, or with a swishy mannerism, the child will imitate .. learn to speak, think and act that way ?!!?
I'm shocked ... what a surprise.
But... but... I thought it was GENETIC!!!!
I think it’s generally accepted that parents are the biggest influences on children - by example. Gay or straight.
Excellent and thanks for the backgrounder. One thing that surprised me about his data was his acceptance of a 5-10% rate of homosexuality among the general populace. I thought the best numbers we have put it in the 2-3% range. Do you know his source or if he’s backed off that larger figure?
why so much backlash by gays? why aren’t they proud that their kids are more likely to be gay? could a deep sense of shame be the cause?
You thoughts are like mind - it is why Kennedy’s comments that there are 40,000 children to same sex couple in California (from the Red book).
They want to change all the government forms to NOT reflect “Parent”, “Father”, “Mother”. Pretty sad state we are in.
If it’s a choice, then they can be held accountable for the choice.
The 10% figure was an example of the “jamming” technique used by the left.
Jamming: Promote the appearance that something rare and aberrant is ubiquitous.
Studies show that 92% of homosexual men are not born that way.
They just get sucked into it.
Given the susceptibility of gay men to being infected with AIDS and dying young, it would logically indicate that allowing children to be adopted by gay couples should be discouraged at least as much as smoking is.
Yup, these started appearing:
Later yesterday, a friend posted this as a counter:
I made sure I shared it on my FB page and kept my profile photo in place of my wife and I.
Can you cite any studies? I agree, but these will help me in my arguments outside FR immensely.
Anybody with a mind should be able to deduce that if a child lives with a pervert they will think that perversion is normal.
Such things are not that tough to figure out.
*adopting* ie recruiting infants and toddlers is not becoming a *parent*...its simply moving the agenda on the QUEER front...
i thought all these freaks discounted the Bible and Gods Word, and bellieve instead on the evolution of everything ???
so why havent the QUEER genes resulted in an ability to reproduce the species ???
Part of his method was to deliberately introduced biases in the direction of the politically correct conclusion (hence treating children raised by homosexuals who wouldn’t specify their sexual orientation as heterosexual). Not quarreling with the PC estimate of prevalence (5-10%) is simply part of the method. It makes it makes his conclusions stronger and politicized criticism of the results harder.
I like your profile picture and that is a good idea. I have one friend who put a minus sign meaning against gay marriage. But if nothing else that top picture is just ugly.
The poster boys for the crusade to let gays into the Boy Scouts are two brothers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFdmNx9drzE
Right there, you know its nonsense. The odds of them both randomly being gay - slim to none.
There was a gay kid at my kid’s high school. He was in all the student plays and musicals - flamboyantly gay. Now his younger brother has entered high school...and he emulates his brother. Acts the same way.
I actually believe that alot of the lisp talking, giggling, over the top gay kids are just acting that way (they get the idea from tv of course)...but at the end of the day, they really like girls (and the attention). In fact, acting gay usually lets them spend alot more time with the girls. We had a guy like this when I was in high school - not over the top like today, but effeminate. He always had a bunch of girls around him...and now he’s married to a woman.
Justice Kennedy was the one who made the argument for creating a new right to same sex marriage because Gay's children need married parents.
The question as to why nature only allows opposite sex parents to pro-create human life but it is suddenly natural for 2 or 3 mommies to raise them was not raised, that I know of.
Notice, first we were lectured that we must accept SS adoptive parents for 'the children' (my Mom actually fell for this, China has not), now we are lectured they must have this NEW right for the kids.
And prior to that letting unmarried singles adopt paved the way.
New rights evolution history, have we learned anything here?
With homosexuals as parental role models that’s exactly what I’d expect.
Not a surprize since parents are models for their kids. However when it comes to research on any controversial topic I dont believe anything reported unless I look at the methods, review the data, and see who the investigator is. The vast majority of social research findings these days are complete BS designed to advance an agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.