Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

I have come around to the thinking, that not only should we have let Saddam have Kuwait, we should have let him have Saudi Arabia, as well.


2 posted on 04/04/2013 5:07:10 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

He kept Iran in check. That’s for sure.


4 posted on 04/04/2013 5:08:34 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

This is what Glorious Leader wishes he could say.

But no matter how the tyrants of this world rant and rave, the Church will not die, thanks to the grace of the Lord Christ.

HA!


5 posted on 04/04/2013 5:09:19 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

>>we should have let him have Saudi Arabia, as well.

I have to agree! Saddam was the only decent ruler in the region. He was secular and kept his psychotic people on a short leash. The House of Saud is the vilest bunch of back-stabbing SOBs in the region.


7 posted on 04/04/2013 5:10:28 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
I have come around to the thinking, that not only should we have let Saddam have Kuwait, we should have let him have Saudi Arabia, as well.


Iran is going to take out Saudi Arabia .

49 posted on 04/04/2013 7:09:46 PM PDT by Lera (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson