Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Democrat quickly backs off bill banning guns for people who pose threat
WaPo ^ | April 5, 2013

Posted on 04/05/2013 11:26:56 AM PDT by Red Steel

DENVER — A Colorado Democrat who wanted to prevent individuals suspected of posing a threat from possessing a gun quickly backed off that plan after details of the proposal became public late Thursday.

Rep. Beth McCann said she’s still working on a bill dealing with firearm restrictions for people believed to be a danger, but it’s unclear when it could be introduced or what it would look like.

She said she made a mistake by releasing a draft of the bill.

“It was totally my responsibility for getting it out there,” she said just hours after circulating the proposal that was scrapped.

-snip-

That plan would have allowed psychologists, nurses and counselors to enter a person into the national background check system, prohibiting that individual from legally possessing a firearm for a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment

1 posted on 04/05/2013 11:26:56 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

Ping


2 posted on 04/05/2013 11:27:19 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Sure, only if it applied ONLY to elected officials.


3 posted on 04/05/2013 11:29:37 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Oops! She let the details leak. Should have just passed the bil so THEN people could see what was in it.

By the way hon, do you know which end of the gun the bullet comes out? I doubt that a lot of your democRAT colleagues do.


4 posted on 04/05/2013 11:32:01 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
A Colorado Democrat who wanted to prevent individuals suspected of posing a threat...

A threat to who?

5 posted on 04/05/2013 11:32:27 AM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

no mistake. she just got caught. another meaningless explanation from a denvercrat idiot.


6 posted on 04/05/2013 11:32:58 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government shoud fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Democrats pose a threat (to my liberty). Should they be banned from owning a gun?


7 posted on 04/05/2013 11:33:07 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
CU shrink told about the danger of the theater killer to def ears. There were many warning signs ignored at Columbine. DemoRATS do posses superior STUPIDITY.
8 posted on 04/05/2013 11:33:21 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"A Colorado Democrat who wanted to prevent individuals suspected of posing a threat from possessing a gun..."

Another Democrat! Boy that's a surprise. Ever notice that every last one of these dam gun-grabber bills comes from a slimy phakin' Democrat? The party ought to be outlawed and every last one of the miserable SOB's voted out of office.

The Democrat Party is just plain un-American.

9 posted on 04/05/2013 11:38:18 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Rep. Beth McCann needs to be recalled. I have heard that others are in the early stages of being recalled.


10 posted on 04/05/2013 11:38:41 AM PDT by HOYA97 (twitter @hoya97)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north
 photo LiberalGun_zpsc9f6a21e.jpg
11 posted on 04/05/2013 11:57:26 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Democrat women pose the greatest threat to the nation because they are totally clueless about liberty. They are a walking, talking argument against women’s suffrage.


12 posted on 04/05/2013 12:15:07 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.


Click The Pic To Donate

13 posted on 04/05/2013 12:24:54 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; TigersEye
"Dave Kopel, a law professor and research director at the Independence Institute, a libertarian think tank in Denver, said McCann’s earlier bill raised concerns about due process rights...He said the bill could be 'a really good idea' if it was significantly revised to include 'a fair hearing first with the burden of proof on the government.'"

Thanks, Red.

I disagree with the libertarian law professor. Courts would be highly improper to convict or adjudicate people as being guilty of being suspected of being dangerous in the future or even of being dangerous in the future. And libs complain about others committing the Slippery Slope fallacy.

Presenting a danger in the past would be irrelevant to any such legislative effort. There are already many laws for punishing those who presented some danger or other in the past.

With a law such as that mentioned in the article, libertarian/Libertarian or other fascist/commie groups would be more dangerous and criminal (re. law of our national land) than they already are. But then, that's what they want, isn't it.


14 posted on 04/05/2013 12:27:26 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Rep. Beth McCann needs a psych eval ASAP!


15 posted on 04/05/2013 12:30:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
She released it too early. Forgot to include babysitters, school teachers, Democrats and others who would be suddenly “qualified” to have a person’s rights taken away.
16 posted on 04/05/2013 12:31:58 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

Exactly. Every kid who has been blackmailed by their school into taking psychotropic drugs will then be prohibited from owning a firearm for life.


17 posted on 04/05/2013 12:37:32 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Of course it was a mistake. They only want to ban guns for people who AREN’T a threat to others.


18 posted on 04/05/2013 12:55:55 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Can I really load bullets in my magazines more than once? Now you tell me. /s


19 posted on 04/05/2013 2:04:40 PM PDT by edboock (The United States Constitution ©1787, All Rights Reserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson