Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman 'who bought Renoir for $7 at flea market' faces FBI investigation .... painting was stolen
The Daily Mail Online ^ | April 7, 2013 | NINA GOLGOWSK

Posted on 04/07/2013 7:12:27 AM PDT by Uncle Chip

A Virginia woman claiming to have purchased Renoir painting for $7 at a flea market has been unmasked and is now under FBI investigation after it emerged the painting was stolen in 1951.

Marcia 'Martha' Fuqua from Loudon County, Virginia, had tried to remain anonymous and said she purchased the painting simply for its frame and had no special ‘understanding of art.’

But it has now emerged that the painting 'On the Shore of The Seine' was reported stolen from the Baltimore Museum of Art in 1951, according to the Washington Post.

The FBI seized the painting late last year after learning that information and it has since emerged that Fuqua's mother was a painter who specialised in reproducing the work of several artists including Renoir.....

In Fuqua's September interview she told the Post, 'It’s all very coincidental ... I am one of those people that believes that things happen for a reason.'

'I noticed the frame on this picture and I liked the frame. I bid $7 and I won the box,' she said.

Though the frame boldly shows a center plaque reading RENOIR on it, she said she never thought that it would be authentic, it having been found in a box at a flea market after all.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: baltimore; fuqua; marciafuqua; marciamarthafuqua; ontheshoreoftheseine; renoir; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Mr. K

All right — I’ll bite — what real life image are we looking here???


21 posted on 04/07/2013 8:04:44 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

I read the article and it doesn’t give a clue as to how the authorities could have known about it being in a flea market.

It’s quite common for the authorities to not release certain information lest they compromise the case, methods, or eyewitnesses.


22 posted on 04/07/2013 8:04:45 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I think it was meant to be used as a Rorschach Test.


23 posted on 04/07/2013 8:07:36 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist
Any other theories?

She did try to sell it at auction.

From Judge to Determine Fate of Renoir Stolen in 1951

After it was appraised at $75,000 to $100,000, she made arrangements to have it sold through an auction to be conducted by the Potomack Company. The auction house announced shortly before the sale that it was pulling the painting from its listings after a Washington Post reporter uncovered its history.

How she got it could have been a true story or it could have been something she just made up to cover how she really got it. That's why it's being investigated.

24 posted on 04/07/2013 8:10:34 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
In Renoir's, Bathers, there is a younger gal in splashing in the water in the foreground.

She looked exactly like a gal who was in my 19th Century Art class in college. When the prof put the slide up on the screen, every student in the class did a double take...needless to say, she was a bit embarassed.

25 posted on 04/07/2013 8:13:08 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

She trumpeted its flea market provenance in at least one published interview.

“After the auction house was contacted by a Washington Post reporter who revealed the piece’s theft, the FBI stepped in, immediately removing the painting from Fuqua’s possession.”


26 posted on 04/07/2013 8:14:26 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I see a man dumping Rorschach into the river.


27 posted on 04/07/2013 8:18:58 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
That maybe the ugliest frame I've ever seen...but that's just me...

FMCDH(BITS)

28 posted on 04/07/2013 8:20:49 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

If she bought it just for the frame why was the painting still in it ?

As well most thieves sell stolen property within days if not hours. So her momma is suspect due her profession / hobby skill set.

Momma may have passed away recently and daughter tried to cash in...

My “what if” on the matter....aka serious wild ass guess...SWAG !


29 posted on 04/07/2013 8:21:35 AM PDT by Squantos ( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I received a card with “Bathers” on the front of it. Inside it said “oopppps girls I stepped in it again!”.
30 posted on 04/07/2013 8:26:04 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

***Looks like she wasted her $7.***

Renoir was a good artist. This looks like he used this canvas to wipe excess paint from his brushes after he was done painting for the day.


31 posted on 04/07/2013 8:31:48 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (The murals in OKC are destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Too bad. Two hairs would make the booger a masterpiece.


32 posted on 04/07/2013 8:36:09 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

not just today.....still cannot understand what a “Jackson Pollack” is....what crap...


33 posted on 04/07/2013 8:39:10 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
If she bought it just for the frame why was the painting still in it ?

Oooops How did that happen???

34 posted on 04/07/2013 8:54:42 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Hopefully, she’s only out the $7 and not tons of legal fees for this investigation.


35 posted on 04/07/2013 9:07:27 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

She no doubt has her fingers crossed that her deceased mother’s fingerprints don’t show up on the picture frame.


36 posted on 04/07/2013 9:16:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Does that mean you know where it sat from 1952 thru 1958? /sarcasm


37 posted on 04/07/2013 9:48:28 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist
The story states:

She said she stored it in a plastic trash bag for two years, even in a shed at one point, before having it authenticated as a genuine Renoir.

38 posted on 04/07/2013 9:53:42 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
That's all it is worth. That's surprising to me.

Supposedly the brother recanted his story about how long it had been in the family.

39 posted on 04/07/2013 9:58:10 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
That's all it is worth. That's surprising to me.

Maybe all this publicity over its theft and sequestration for 60 years is part of a plan to drive up its value.

40 posted on 04/07/2013 10:09:19 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson