Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing unveils updated F/A-XX sixth-gen fighter concept
Flight International ^ | 04/07/2013 | Dave Majumdar Washington DC

Posted on 04/07/2013 10:46:46 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Boeing unveils updated F/A-XX sixth-gen fighter concept

Boeing

The Boeing concept also features canards, which is somewhat of a surprise because the motion of those forward mounted control surfaces is generally assumed to compromise a stealth aircraft's frontal radar cross-section. But the lack of vertical tail surfaces suggests the aircraft would be optimized for all-aspect broadband stealth, which would be needed for operations in the most challenging anti-access/area denial environments.

Also of note in the manned version of the company's F/A-XX concept is the placement of the cockpit-rearward visibility appears to be restricted without the aid of a sensor apparatus similar to the F-35's distributed aperture system of six infrared cameras.

The Boeing F/A-XX concept is a response to a USN request for information (RFI) from April 2012 soliciting data for a replacement for the service's Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler fleets in the 2030s. The Super Hornet fleet is expected to start reaching the end of the jet's 9000h useful lifespan during that time period.

"The intent of this research is to solicit industry inputs on candidate solutions for CVN [nuclear-powered aircraft carrier] based aircraft to provide air supremacy with a multi-role strike capability in an anti-access/area denied (A2AD) operational environment," the navy RFI stated. "Primary missions include, but are not limited to, air warfare (AW), strike warfare (STW), surface warfare (SUW), and close air support (CAS)."

Navy leaders had said at the time that they expect any new F/A-XX design to have greatly increased range and offer far superior kinematic performance compared to existing tactical aircraft.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; faxx; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: John Valentine

Not for long, if we have no money.

That is the thing I have the biggest problem with in all this.

OUR SIDE is all for making things in China.

Now because of that, we are facing a relentlessly growing, relentlessly more powerful and egotistical even, China which has now grown to the extent that China now makes and exports more than America does.

And America’s products are SHRINKING.

We must do this differently. I agree we should keep defense strong, but we should keep AMERICA strong.

All our jobs need to be protected, and brought back home.

Now.


41 posted on 04/08/2013 6:12:15 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Mind you in all this:

I am not in the military.

I do not know, and do not want to know, anything about what may or may not be ... whatever. Don’t even go there.

But it sure seems right now, our appetites have gotten (far, far) ahead of our budgets.

We need to bring US production home. Not just jets.

All sorts of things.

Now.


42 posted on 04/08/2013 6:28:10 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Really? How long did it take to develop and deploy an atomic bomb from a cold start?

With slide rules, chalk, and all manual machine tools?

How long should it take now with high performance computers, CAD/CAM, CNC machine tools and 3-d printers?

I would hazard a guess and say that a modern stealth fighter is orders of magnitude more complex than the WWII era bombs. Just the avionics software alone has millions of lines of code which has to be of much higher quality than typical software applications.

43 posted on 04/08/2013 9:26:35 PM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

My point was that the F-35 was supposed to have a carrier variant as well, and given that it hasn’t even done well as a regular land-based aircraft, Boeing is making sure they have a proposal ready to go when the Navy comes calling.


44 posted on 04/08/2013 11:25:50 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

yeah there are some F35s out there for testing, evaluation (which is going poorly) and training. None are deployed for combat nor will any be deployed for combat anytime soon. The F22 one the other hand is operational and in production. Maybe we should scrap the F35 and go with the F22 instead.


45 posted on 04/09/2013 6:35:21 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson