Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBO To Army: Scrap Ground Combat Vehicle, Buy German Puma
AOL ^ | April 2, 2013 | By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.

Posted on 04/08/2013 11:12:18 AM PDT by 11th_VA

WASHINGTON: The Army's proposed Ground Combat Vehicle would offer less combat power, at a higher cost, than buying the German-made Puma already in production or even just upgrading the Army's existing M2 Bradley, according to the Congressional Budget Office. CBO issued a report today assessing different alternatives to upgrade Army heavy brigades' infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), tank-like war machines with tracks and turrets designed to carry troops into combat.

The non-partisan CBO, Capitol Hill's in-house thinktank, has slammed the Ground Combat Vehicle program before, but never this hard. The office's analysts took the Army's own criteria and created a grading system that scored different combat vehicles for effectiveness. Using a scoring scheme that prioritized protection above all, followed by firepower, mobility, and passenger capacity, in that order, the CBO rated the Puma highest, followed by a notional upgrade to the Bradley, followed in distant third place by the GCV. (The Israeli-built Namer came in fourth). Even under an alternative grading scheme that weighted all four criteria equally -- putting much more emphasis on the capacity to carry troops -- the 6-passenger Puma still edged out the 9-passenger GCV, largely because of its superior firepower.

(Excerpt) Read more at defense.aol.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: bradey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Geez, why don't we just outsource the whole freekin Army ...
1 posted on 04/08/2013 11:12:18 AM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I hear the UN is available...


2 posted on 04/08/2013 11:13:10 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot ("If this be treason, make the most of it." - Patrick Henry, 30 May 1765)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
That's right, we don't need no veeheecles!


3 posted on 04/08/2013 11:18:49 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Time to re-watch The Pentagon Wars".
4 posted on 04/08/2013 11:20:14 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Happy Hunger Games! May the odds be ever in your favor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

The Bradley does have a very good record, doesn’t it?

Why the need for a new design?


5 posted on 04/08/2013 11:22:00 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Did they figure in the cost for a set of metric wrenches?


6 posted on 04/08/2013 11:23:02 AM PDT by Moltke ("I am Dr. Sonderborg," he said, "and I don't want any nonsense.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

It’s not just the Army. DOD procurement takes the price of everything into the stratosphere.


7 posted on 04/08/2013 11:23:23 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA; Kartographer; Travis McGee
Geez, why don't we just outsource the whole freekin Army ...

That was instrumental in Rome's fall too, using Foederati, Foreigners replaced the Roman Legionnaires.

Needless to say, they didn't work out as well as actual Romans with skin in the game.

8 posted on 04/08/2013 11:23:33 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Yeah buying the Fuchs from Germany really worked well < /sarcasm>


9 posted on 04/08/2013 11:24:07 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

some times its better.. would love to have ad Panthers instead of Shermans ;)


10 posted on 04/08/2013 11:24:12 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Why not give the Army all those Father, I mean Homeland troop carriers?


11 posted on 04/08/2013 11:24:52 AM PDT by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Aye! The soldiers are all dead, but at least they died in an American made armored vehicle!

Kind of tough to choose side in this battle.


12 posted on 04/08/2013 11:25:18 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever
DOD procurement takes the price of everything into the stratosphere.

I know, I work them too ... it's just I hate to see jobs go overseas ...

13 posted on 04/08/2013 11:26:51 AM PDT by 11th_VA (DRONES DON'T KILL, PRESIDENTS KILL ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Why the need for a new design?

Because we have a new generation of officers who need high paying jobs to go to when they leave the Army.

14 posted on 04/08/2013 11:27:17 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moltke

Metric Wrenches???

How about converting toilet seats to metric — that will cost LOTS of Euros.


15 posted on 04/08/2013 11:30:51 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

At least in using and protecting our own technology (ex the Clinton era) we can control the design information leakage and give our allies only those features we want to release.

Buying from the Germans means the EU and most probably Russia and China already know how they are made and how to defeat them.


16 posted on 04/08/2013 11:31:55 AM PDT by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever
DOD procurement takes the price of everything into the stratosphere.

Don't forget to consider that DOD procurement also makes a troop carrier weigh 75 tons (or whatever).

17 posted on 04/08/2013 11:40:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Buy the German Puma

I hear they are VERY ERY EXPENSIVE, and only a few left.....PERFECT for the future OBAMA Army!


18 posted on 04/08/2013 11:55:35 AM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I remember the Armored Reconnaissance Scout Vehicle competition to select a replacement for the underpowered M114. It took place during the summer of 1974 at Ft. Knox. The soldiers really like the British Scimitar and the Canadian M113 1/2 aka Lynx officially the XM800T.
http://xbradtc.com/2011/02/16/the-lynx-m113-half/

There were several other competitors, to include a Sheridan chassis with rollbars. The Army ended up not selecting any of them. The argument against the Scimitar was that its engine was gasoline, not diesel.

the XM800T was also well liked:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM800_Armored_Reconnaissance_Scout_Vehicle

I’ve got some pictures somewhere at home from this testing. Another vehicle tested was the Lockheed Twister, XM800W.

I don’t think the Dutch YPR-765(?) variant was included in the testing.


19 posted on 04/08/2013 12:08:05 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Whoops....looks like CBO GRADED THE WRONG AFV

I'm sure there is more drama to come of this.

20 posted on 04/08/2013 12:14:13 PM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson