Posted on 04/23/2013 2:20:24 PM PDT by Biggirl
We don't have any evidence to support your teetotaler assertion. How do we know this isn't propaganda?
How do you explain your incoherent comments posted last night? Did your cat hijack your keyboard, or did your evil twin escape from the attic? You've got some 'splainin to do, Lucy.
Some on this thread would include Freepers, I’m pretty sure as you have to be a member of Free Republic to post. But, I guess I owe you an apology. You surely never said Freepers....
That’s right ~ but someone who thinks she has a dispute did say “lie” ~ and “lied” with absolutely no foundation. Sometimes I get impatient with people who don’t know how to debate a question.
The incoherence was in the mind of the beholder ~ stay up late beyond your mother’s bedtime for you and stuff just happens, but you have much more familiarity with cheap and tawdry dives and how people behave there than I do.
That's the statement you found incoherent ~ to wit, my asking three posters before you if they knew what the people on the ground said about it.
That's not incoherent ~ that's the heart of the debate, and any kind of answer quoting a participant would have converted the video from propaganda to news.
The 4th amendment does not extend the middle eastern rights of hospitality to mad dog bombers hiding in your boat! Besides, nobody tried to hide him.
you are their ring leader ~ you are trying to find any reason you can why the perp has to be freed ~ you probably didn’t realize that there’s plenty of evidence already that’s going to get him executed.
You don't suppose that maybe the cops doing the searching for a mad dog killer like this might have had their minds on CATCHING HIM ~ or at most doughnuts ~ they did leave some donut shops open for them.
Are you sure you can keep up with a discussion board?
LMAO—no problem with cogent discussion. That’s not what you produced last night, painful as it was to disentangle the rambling.
you are feigning ignorance of all the threads on that exact same video that’d been fouling up FR and other sites all day long.
Sorry, I didn't intend that. I was answering the question you posed tho, ie did anyone have a reply...I always do get a little upset when I see the suggestion of "government rights" tho, please pardon me.
No one else answered the question but one person did post the URL to another thread that had more discussion about it. I forgot to get it but you can backtrack our replies and find it.
And, thank you for your kind reply. With all the anger we have I appreciate reasonable people. ;)
Drama Queen thread.
Let me know when the Boston area people, who applauded the police, start complaining about the police tracking down the terrorist punk.
There an exception to getting a warrant called the emergency administrative search rule. But that would apply more if there were leaking gas in an area and immediate action were needed. Here one could argue the same should apply. First, ever, if they were searching for a terrorist, they had no right to search people who came out of the house, because none of them was the terrorist. Second, unlike leaking gas, the cops had no real information about where the terrorist was. I do not believe the emergency administrative exception applied here.
Thanks for your good explanation rcofdayton. We worry about ‘what’ the laws are, but Obama and Holder will just do what they please, regardless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.