Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS: ‘WE COULD FACE COOLING PERIOD FOR 200-250 YEARS’
The Voice of Russia ^ | 4/28/2013 | None cited

Posted on 04/29/2013 3:54:22 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty

‘We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040.’

Global warming which has been the subject of so many discussions in recent years, may give way to global cooling. According to scientists from the Pulkovo Observatory in St.Petersburg, solar activity is waning, so the average yearly temperature will begin to decline as well. Scientists from Britain and the US chime in saying that forecasts for global cooling are far from groundless. Some experts warn that a change in the climate may affect the ambitious projects for the exploration of the Arctic that have been launched by many countries.

Just recently, experts said that the Arctic ice cover was becoming thinner while journalists warned that the oncoming global warming would make it possible to grow oranges in the north of Siberia. Now, they say a cold spell will set in. Apparently, this will not occur overnight, Yuri Nagovitsyn of the Pulkovo Observatory, says.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegwpf.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; climate; cooling; globalcooling; globalwarming; solar; sun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Herodes

Cooling periods have historically always been an economic disaster. Of course, we have never had one with modern medicine, heat and electricity so who knows?


21 posted on 04/29/2013 5:34:59 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

We’ve also never had one with radical Marxists steering the most powerful nation on Earth. If there’s economic disaster ahead (and I believe there is), cold weather will be the least of our worries.


22 posted on 04/29/2013 5:57:32 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

This will also mean famine and wars.

The last cooling period wasn’t a very happy time in history.


23 posted on 04/29/2013 6:01:02 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Warming? Cooling? Make up your minds already! (Or just come out and admit everybody but important people have to live like cavemen.)


24 posted on 04/29/2013 6:03:58 AM PDT by jughandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

I’m sure the folks in Novosibersk were just overjoyed to hear this news.


25 posted on 04/29/2013 6:11:59 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I agree. The global warming nuts will claim what little changes they have made have now turned the climate in the opposite direction. OH NO! what to do.


26 posted on 04/29/2013 7:01:16 AM PDT by carpenter45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
So why should we find this any more credible than the global warming claims?

Why? At a purely scientific level because relatively simple models of the earth's climate based on solar irradiance, solar magnetism (for which sunspot number is a proxy), and the earth's orbit correctly retrodict the earth's climate on a scale of millenia in fairly fine detail, while the hugely complex computer models used by the AGW crowd to "prove" that human CO2 emissions were (or are) causing "global warming" can't be made to agree with the climatic record on a time scale of centuries.

On a sociological level because predictions based on solar models don't support anyone's political agenda, while the warming predictions predicated on human causation support the left's agenda of extending state control over every aspect of human activity.

27 posted on 04/29/2013 7:01:46 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
"But how was Herschel to back up his hypothesis? Hampered by the lack of precise meteorological records by which to test his theory, he persevered by lateral thinking. Given the effects of lesser or greater quantities of sunshine on vegetation, it struck him that records of good or bad harvests might provide him with the data he needed. Any correlation between these and periods of many or few sunspots would theoretically support his argument. Using Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations as his source, he was able to single out five periods when, due to poor harvests, the price of wheat in England had been particularly high. Comparing these records to those of sunspot activity during those periods, he discovered to his surprise a clear correlation between poorer wheat harvests and a relative lack of sunspot activity. Contrary to what had been thought until then, the presence of sunspots did not reduce the amount of heat from the sun, the opposite was true: greater sunspot activity corresponded to good weather and lower wheat prices, while a lack of sunspots corresponded to high wheat prices, which implied less favourable weather. ‘It seems probable,’ he wrote, ‘that some temporary scarcity or defect of the vegetation has taken place when the sun has been without those appearances which we surmise to be the symptoms of a copious emission of light and heat’. As we now know, the sun emits greater ultraviolet radiation, causing more heating of the Earth’s atmosphere, during periods of greater sunspot activity, or solar maximum. But in Herschel’s time this was a revolutionary idea – and the apparent correlation with Earth’s climate made it more revolutionary still. "
28 posted on 04/29/2013 7:22:35 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Actually that’s not right, since their strident claim has been that greenhouse gasses trump all other influences, including the Sun.

Intellectual honesty hasn't exactly been their strong suit. The low information voter just listens to what Jon Stewart and NPR tell them today, they don't care to compare it with what they were told yesterday.

29 posted on 04/29/2013 7:24:15 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

How do you say “Climate deniers” in Russian?


30 posted on 04/29/2013 8:33:19 AM PDT by TauntedTiger (Keep away from the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
A major cooling would cause at least some societal collapse.

Not something to look forward to even if it would shut the greenie-weenies up.

31 posted on 04/29/2013 8:41:56 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Promotional Fee Paid for by "Ouchies" The Sharp, Prickly Toy You Bathe With!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

I think it has started. Pretty chilly here.

http://classic.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=Vostok,%20Antarctica&wuSelect=WEATHER


32 posted on 04/29/2013 9:22:41 AM PDT by kawhill (kawhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson