Posted on 04/29/2013 3:54:22 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040.
Global warming which has been the subject of so many discussions in recent years, may give way to global cooling. According to scientists from the Pulkovo Observatory in St.Petersburg, solar activity is waning, so the average yearly temperature will begin to decline as well. Scientists from Britain and the US chime in saying that forecasts for global cooling are far from groundless. Some experts warn that a change in the climate may affect the ambitious projects for the exploration of the Arctic that have been launched by many countries.
Just recently, experts said that the Arctic ice cover was becoming thinner while journalists warned that the oncoming global warming would make it possible to grow oranges in the north of Siberia. Now, they say a cold spell will set in. Apparently, this will not occur overnight, Yuri Nagovitsyn of the Pulkovo Observatory, says.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegwpf.org ...
Cooling periods have historically always been an economic disaster. Of course, we have never had one with modern medicine, heat and electricity so who knows?
We’ve also never had one with radical Marxists steering the most powerful nation on Earth. If there’s economic disaster ahead (and I believe there is), cold weather will be the least of our worries.
This will also mean famine and wars.
The last cooling period wasn’t a very happy time in history.
Warming? Cooling? Make up your minds already! (Or just come out and admit everybody but important people have to live like cavemen.)
I’m sure the folks in Novosibersk were just overjoyed to hear this news.
I agree. The global warming nuts will claim what little changes they have made have now turned the climate in the opposite direction. OH NO! what to do.
Why? At a purely scientific level because relatively simple models of the earth's climate based on solar irradiance, solar magnetism (for which sunspot number is a proxy), and the earth's orbit correctly retrodict the earth's climate on a scale of millenia in fairly fine detail, while the hugely complex computer models used by the AGW crowd to "prove" that human CO2 emissions were (or are) causing "global warming" can't be made to agree with the climatic record on a time scale of centuries.
On a sociological level because predictions based on solar models don't support anyone's political agenda, while the warming predictions predicated on human causation support the left's agenda of extending state control over every aspect of human activity.
Intellectual honesty hasn't exactly been their strong suit. The low information voter just listens to what Jon Stewart and NPR tell them today, they don't care to compare it with what they were told yesterday.
How do you say “Climate deniers” in Russian?
Not something to look forward to even if it would shut the greenie-weenies up.
I think it has started. Pretty chilly here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.