Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rise of the Neo-Birchers
Townhall.com ^ | April 30, 2013 | Paul Greenberg

Posted on 04/30/2013 7:07:38 AM PDT by Kaslin

A cancer is eating away at a once Grand Old Party, and if the party doesn't wake up and take precautions, it may wind up only a shadow of its better self -- a hollowed-out refuge for haters and paranoids and the kind of ideological parasites that can reduce a major party to a minor one.

The historian Richard Hofstadter spoke of a "paranoid style in American politics," and noted its "sense of heated exaggeration, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy." He called it "an old and recurrent phenomenon in our public life," one that it isn't confined to left or right. It's an equal-opportunity form of craziness and, sure enough, it's back. If it ever went away.

Somewhere there must still be a remnant of the John Birch Society buried in the woodwork of American politics and still burrowing away. Such types swarm in the fever swamps of any society's culture, but in hard times, or just uncertain ones, they tend to overflow and threaten the health and stability of even long established and respected institutions, societies and whole civilizations.

Think of Germany in the 1930s and the Nazi sickness, or the conditions that led to the rise of bolshevism in Russia as the West destroyed itself in a first world war that would prove but a harbinger of an even greater and more calamitous second one.

Or take the long view and see what has befallen Islamic civilization since it was once renowned for its arts and sciences, its tolerance and hospitality, its architecture -- and its poetry! The civilization that gave us Ibn Khaldun and Harun al-Rashid now languishes, and in its decline produces al-Qaida types whose idea of progress is death and destruction. Their murderous rhetoric, once lightly dismissed by a West grown fat and careless, proved all too serious.

There's a lesson in all this if we in the West will ever learn it -- and act. Whether it's Mein Kampf or the Communist Manifesto or today's fatwas coming out of the Arab world, words can lead to acts. Horrible acts. And shouldn't be lightly dismissed.

Consider a couple of recent rhetorical performances here in bucolic Arkansas of all places:

Right in the middle of the citywide shutdown in Boston that followed the bombings at the finish line of its famed Marathon, a state representative and gun enthusiast named Nate Bell twittered a nasty little message about Bostonians "cowering in their homes" without firearms -- just when the rest of America was thinking of their calm courage and vigilance. (Which once again paid off.)

Happily, that state legislator was rewarded by a flood of responses -- not just from Arkansas but many another state -- that let him know just how far over the line he'd wandered. America seems awake to the danger that words as thoughtless as his represent. Even he soon thought better of them -- though he apologized only for their "timing," not their substance. Sad.

About the same time, a Republican couple in the hills of picturesque Benton County up in the Ozarks spewed out the same sort of vitriol -- not in private conversation or emails to their fellow fanatics but in the newsletter of the county's Republican organization. Words like "traitors" and "turncoats" were used to describe their party's state legislators. Or at least those who finally, patiently worked out a compromise on the contentious and convoluted issue of Obamacare and its impact on Medicaid in this state.

At one point the article in the newsletter referred to legislators who don't agree with its views as "bullet backstops." The article asserted that the Second Amendment "means nothing unless those in power believe you would have no problem simply walking up and shooting them...." No reservations or context can justify that kind of trash talk. Which has a way of leading to trashy actions. Or worse.

The head of that country's Republican organization wasted no time demanding these people's resignations from the party's county committee, which may be the best news about this whole mess. Because if Republicans aren't vigilant, loudmouths like these will become the voice of their party -- and decent Americans of all political persuasions will be repelled. Rightly so. And react. Which is what happened to the Birchers in their less than glorious heyday.

Lest we forget, the John Birch Society didn't fade away on its own, any more than malignant cancers clear up on their own. All good men -- and women -- came to the aid of their party and cleaned it out. Thinkers and leaders of courage and conviction, and of unquestionably conservative credentials, rose up to expose and oppose the danger the John Birch Society represented. Thinkers and leaders like the late great William F. Buckley Jr., who would not be silent in the face of what he recognized as a fatal threat to his party and its principles -- and to the conscience of conservatives regardless of party.

For what is conservatism except an attachment to the tried and true, to the wisdom of hard-earned experience over the zealotry of empty theory, to custom and tradition, to the civilities and grace notes of life, to tolerance and manners rather than the crudities of the moment? For conservatism is more a civilized inclination than a point-by-point program to be outlined in some party newsletter or elaborated to death in one of Rand Paul's 12-hour filibusters. It is a belief in the kind of positive change that, because it is based on the past, will endure in the future.

These neo-Birchers aren't conservatives. They're the opposite: radicals who believe they've got the true faith and all the rest of us are infidels.

Unless the Republican Party’s leaders -- and its grass roots, too -- get a grip on this slithering danger and proceed to rise up and root it out, someday Americans may wonder what ever happened to the party of Lincoln, who spoke of charity for all and malice toward none. That forgotten party will have gone like the Whigs, torn apart.

At that point, Republicans will have become like the old man in a dark shop that Whittaker Chambers warned his party about as the original Birchers proliferated. The old man in his dark shop wasn't really interested in selling anything, just sitting there and stroking his merchandise.

Both the Birchers and now these neo-Birchers represent the greatest obstacle to a Republican comeback in American politics, which is Republicans themselves. Or at least the kind who fall for this load of ideology, or who think they can safely ignore these fanatics out to hijack their party. Remember: Silence gives consent.

Republicans out to save their country might consider saving their party first.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birch; birchers; boston; guncontrol; jbs; johnbirchsociety; marathonbombers; neobirchers; radicalism; secondamendment; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: Kaslin

The real cancer eating away at the GOP isn’t “extremism,” it’s the stealth-liberalism of the McCains, Roves, and Bushes that has come to dominate the party’s thinking on a wide range of issues. The author of this hit piece seems to think that what the Republican party needs is more of the same.


101 posted on 04/30/2013 11:45:22 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Must be kinda like those presently running the republican party then.


102 posted on 04/30/2013 11:46:21 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Count of Monte Fisto

Calling those who see our liberties and way of life eroded by the minute “paranoid” for their strident rhetoric is like blaming the man pounding on your door warning you that your house is on fire for being loud and inarticulate.


103 posted on 04/30/2013 11:48:38 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Funny, but the GOP fails when the squishes run and succeeds when conservatives prevail. Bush may have won the presidency twice, but he left the GOP brand a smoking ruin when he left, and it was only resurrected by the Tea Party 'radicals' that Greenburg decries.

Sure, you can always find some over-the-top rhetoric if you look hard enough - and the RINOs are guilty of that as well in their attacks on the Tea Party. The larger points are, who has the clear vision for the country and who wins elections? It ain't the squishes.

As far as I'm concerned, the real "radicals" in the GOP are those like McCain and Miss Graham. Their calls for sending US troops to fight alongside Islamist guerillas in Syria and demands for a de facto open borders immigration policy are quite radical, but they don't seem to be called on it.

104 posted on 04/30/2013 11:55:38 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I had to stop reading when I came upon this

"see what has befallen Islamic civilization since it was once renowned for its arts and sciences, its tolerance and hospitality, its architecture"

Total PC bullsh*t, Islam conquered the wealthiest and most learned part of the old Roman Empire and then the Eastern Roman Empire itself. It was a world of Christian believe, commerce and education. Advances in science and math were made by the ruminants of that older civilization not the Islamists. Or stolen from the great Indian civilization. After a few hundred years under Islam the last vestiges of the older cultured died and the people degenerated into what we now call Islamic culture. Raving women beating homicidal lunatics. Thank the Hellenistic culture for whatever greatness briefly existed after the Islamists took over.

105 posted on 04/30/2013 12:03:01 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

Pretty much. I’m hoping the Tea Party will be smart enough to not take in the flotsam and jetsam from the dissolving Rep. party and avoid inheriting the baggage they’ll bring.

I think the world is undergoing an economic sea change similar to that caused by the industrial revolution and so a lot of crazy is unleashed in these unstable times.

That unprecedented era of growth after WWII was just that, unprecedented and people need to jettison their expectations that it can go on forever.

People are always bleating about the offshoring of manufacturing, but they need to come to grips with the fact that manufacturing of the future won’t be done by people at all but by robots. Those jobs are gone forever and they won’t be coming back.

A lot of service jobs have been replaced by computers as well. A law office no longer needs an army of researchers and secretaries. A great number of “information” service jobs are make work caused by government regulation and so are a drag on the economy rather than a productive part of it. If the governments crash, all those jobs in the gov’t and private sector will go away.

The fact is, we have a huge number of people the economy just doesn’t need anymore and are now resting comfortably in the government safety net.

We need people to get inventive and creative and the safety net obviates a key ingredient; desperation.


106 posted on 04/30/2013 12:18:55 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

/Giggle.

Paul Greenfield expects me to buy his argument by using a variant of Godwin’s Law to smear people he doesn’t like.

Nice try.


107 posted on 04/30/2013 12:20:17 PM PDT by sauropod (I will not comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

GreenBERG!


108 posted on 04/30/2013 12:20:46 PM PDT by sauropod (I will not comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Call him Brownfield in the future (for polluting the internet pipes).


109 posted on 04/30/2013 12:26:47 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

This is nonsense. For concerted extremism eating away at the fabric of society look no further than the Democrat party. Theirs is the despotism that needs to be destroyed in the name of human dignity.
The singular reality of the Republican party is its leadership’s insistence on moral compromise at all cost. Its salvation will be the Tea Party, not some prettified version of Chamberlain politics.
Bostonians did cower in their homes. They did forego their right to privacy. They did surrender their civil liberties in the face of an unarmed injured child running from the police.
I am continuously bemused by progressives advising conservatives on how to be conservative. Their advise is always to be more liberal. Why should anything they say be held in any repute other than contempt?


110 posted on 04/30/2013 12:56:33 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Greenberg sounds like a concern troll.


111 posted on 04/30/2013 3:19:43 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Biden '13. Impeach now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Virginia can be considered a reliably blue state now.
112 posted on 04/30/2013 4:42:47 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

“Really? I went out and walked the dogs three times. Saw some neighbors go out and do errands. Didn’t see any cops. They were all too busy sifting through Watertown to bother with the surrounding communities.”

That’s good to hear. Just out of curiosity, what is the geographic size and population of Watertown? From what I saw it isn’t that big.


113 posted on 04/30/2013 4:50:07 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

There is very little difference between the Dems and the RINOs. They are so often in lockstep as to be indistinguishable.


114 posted on 04/30/2013 4:55:17 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Doesn't sound like it's "neo-Birchers," just louts.

If they're in your neck of the woods and they embarrass you you might make more of it than that, but maybe it's just bad manners.

115 posted on 04/30/2013 5:00:42 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The spoiled, trouble-making hags and SNAGs (sensitive New Age guys) of the “progressive” fascists are intentionally fomenting the hysteria and panic. Their public announcements and publications have recently often included exaggerated/unfounded disaster predictions and implied threats to further tax, illegally spy on and rob Americans. Their television media trash does the same. Are you a “progressive?”


116 posted on 04/30/2013 5:11:40 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Paul, you ignorant slut.


117 posted on 04/30/2013 5:19:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

The Democrats haven’t “swept” the statewide VA ballot (Gov/Lt Gov/Atty Gen + Legislature) since 1989. They also haven’t voted for the party in the White House for the top offices since 1973.


118 posted on 04/30/2013 5:23:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Right in the middle of the citywide shutdown in Boston that followed the bombings at the finish line of its famed Marathon, a state representative and gun enthusiast named Nate Bell twittered a nasty little message about Bostonians "cowering in their homes" without firearms -- just when the rest of America was thinking of their calm courage and vigilance. (Which once again paid off.)"

If Mr. Greenberg wanted to write about something in particular, why didn't he just come out of the anti-Second-Amendment closet and write about it instead of wrapping it in too many paragraphs of generalizing, false insults against conservatives in general?

There are some otherwise harmless kooks commenting on Internet discussion boards. But like I said, they're no worse than the bureaucrats intentionally implying threats and antagonizing them. If some upscale constituents are so paranoid and afraid of downscale conservatives in general, maybe they should get psychological help and stop pushing corrupt politicians to violate our Second and Fourth Amendments.


119 posted on 04/30/2013 5:32:54 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Guys like the author are the cancer.


120 posted on 04/30/2013 5:34:40 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson