Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Losing South Carolina (GOP throws Mark Sanford under bus)
http://www.redstate.com ^ | April 30, 2013 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 04/30/2013 10:21:37 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: Christie at the beach

Sanford is nothing more than a hubris filled moron. He actually thought that his ex-wife’s complaint against him would remain sealed??? Hell, Obamas path to the White House was PAVED with sealed family court documents that made it into the public domain.

He shouldn’t have run. If he loses the only one to blame is him. I don’t know how I’d vote if I lived there, so I’m not going to criticize how other people do.

I will say this: the Colbert-Busch as a union tool argument is a red herring desperation tactic. She gets 18 months as a Dem member of the GOP controlled House. Then she has to defend whatever record she compiles in a solidly GOP district. It’s not going to be whether she loses, but by how much. If she turns out to be a union tool who undemines Boeings attempt to bring jobs to the state, or a Pelosi pawn, she’s going to get crushed. Completely.


61 posted on 04/30/2013 10:59:33 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So you really think Sanford has a snowball's chance in hell?

Dunno. But I would guess he wouldn't come to FR looking for encouragement. Trey Gowdy's my Rep.

Charleston, do you want a 100% pure and saintly Obama liberal who has never had an affair? Or do you want a former effective conservative S. C. Governor to represent you?
62 posted on 04/30/2013 10:59:59 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I don’t see how having this guy be part of the face of the GOP is of benefit to us. He’s part of the problem...and we already have enough others who are a problem without adding more to the mix.


63 posted on 04/30/2013 11:00:02 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga
The stalking was recent...

Stalking?! Are you SURE that was what happened? How are you sure?
64 posted on 04/30/2013 11:02:12 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I don’t see how having this guy be part of the face of the GOP is of benefit to us.

Do YOU find the 2013 face of the GOP to be attractive as it is? Well, it doesn't shift my gears.
65 posted on 04/30/2013 11:05:38 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: manc

No one wants the socialist, but it’s Sanford’s own fault his poll numbers tanked. Can’t blame GOP for the guy’s pathetic personal life.


66 posted on 04/30/2013 11:06:54 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Don't know what you are asking me. Are you suggesting what he did was fine? Are you suggesting that “conservative” adulterors should get a pass as long as they are running against a liberal?
67 posted on 04/30/2013 11:07:41 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: manc

What Mark Stanford did was wrong morally & practicably. He places the Romania emotion of love above the commitment of marriage.

This we cannot endorse nor hold as acceptable if the institution of Marriage is to survive. At the same time the South Carolina GOP has put us into the foolish position of having to either support this guy or a leftist(by absence).

I do not like the situation, and the south Carolina GOP deserves condemnation for allowing it. But we must remember politics is not the art the possible NOT desirable.

We must support Stanford in this election while working to reform the South Carolina GOP to prohibit such situations from happening again.


68 posted on 04/30/2013 11:07:49 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

He was violating a court order and on his wife’s property. Call it whatever you want, he got caught. I call is stalking, as he was not invited and had no right to be there.


69 posted on 04/30/2013 11:08:31 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: manc

*We must remember politics is the art the possible NOT desirable.*


70 posted on 04/30/2013 11:09:11 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tioga

if no one wants the socialist then why keep doing the lefts work and attacking Sanford, we know damn well what he did and we can sort that out at a later date but to risk losing this seat and helping Obama is plain nuts


71 posted on 04/30/2013 11:10:06 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

agree, we all know it was stupid but to attack him and then say SC deserves this etc is plain nuts.
We have to win this seat no matter what ,w e have to not want Obama t get an easier time pushing his socialist agenda


72 posted on 04/30/2013 11:11:16 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: manc

Frankly, it’s up to the voters of his district. I don’t live there and refuse to condone this lunatic. Are they screwed? You betcha. Is it fair? No. Life never is.


73 posted on 04/30/2013 11:11:57 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
All commies have sex with large dogs and sheep ~ or goats ~ we know that ~ but Sanford is at the beginning stages of a mental deterioration that usually takes you into leftwingtard land pretty soon.

I think Marks supporters are going to be very disappointed.

BTW, if the concern about losing is because his poll numbers tanked, the problem is in the polling, not Sanford. People don't switch their support from the guy they just voted FOR to the she devil they voted AGAINST like that. Her numbers didn't go up. She's most likely the plain old leftwingtard idiot she's always been.

74 posted on 04/30/2013 11:13:42 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Let’s face it! The GOP no longer represents conservative Americans. It only represents the GOP and basically GOP insiders as well. They are in fact turning themselves into political toast.


75 posted on 04/30/2013 11:15:18 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durus
Don't know what you are asking me. Are you suggesting what he did was fine? Are you suggesting that “conservative” adulterors should get a pass as long as they are running against a liberal?

Was just wondering about your interest in S.C.'s 1st Cong. Dist. race (Charleston) from up there in N.H.

And while you're trying to put words in my mouth regarding adulterers getting a pass, try this answer on for size: It's folks like you on FR that cannot see the plank in their own eyes. Sure, stone Sanford and stone him again, if you are qualified.
76 posted on 04/30/2013 11:18:26 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: manc
I am not joking. Anyone that would break that vow to his wife wouldn't hesitate a second to break his oath of office. He lied about it repeatedly until he realized he couldn't get away with it and then and only then did he "come clean". Sure having a flaming liberal in office is bad, but neither should even be considered for office.

I can't vote for either of them, but there is something terribly wrong with America when having Sanford lose is considered a tragedy for the republican party, or SC. What makes you think that Sanford wouldn't do the same thing the flaming liberal would? He's betrayed people a lot more dear to him than some pesky constituents. Constituents I might add that are proving it doesn't matter what you do or say as long as you have name recognition.

77 posted on 04/30/2013 11:18:35 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: manc

nothing specific here.

However I wonder how many of these “walk on water” holier than thou” stay at home non-voters are really bubba strategy plants to help democrats.

The bubba stategy is to push the meme to “stay home” rather than vote becaus the republican candidate is not perfect enough like bubba is perfect.

It is a strategy to depress the votes. So the media matters outfits of podesta go onto sites and say “don’t vote” to take votes off the playing field.

Odd how nobody here tries viral efforts with the dummies.


78 posted on 04/30/2013 11:18:36 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Gets tossed out in 2014

Oh really? Care to revisit conservative NY21? The rat William Lewis “Bill” Owens is still representing that district. Almost without exception any R over any D any day.

79 posted on 04/30/2013 11:20:47 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
I know what he is.

He should step down but he's not going to. If the dems win; due to the purists vs. fighting back with the cards we have to deal with, that's what will occur. I'd rather have him so the people of South Carolina can have a chance to reason with him to vote the way he needs to. If the corrupt woman wins, another robot for oBama. We have to stop the army of the left even if we get the not so good candidates until we can get better ones. He should have not run, yes but he's there.

80 posted on 04/30/2013 11:23:19 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson