long haul for a prop plane over hostile country
Posted on 05/03/2013 2:28:37 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
Yea but does the IAF have them? I dunno. Also, can the 27 carry the weight? I am clueless on this subject.
Well that ain’t gonna work ‘) Could still do it the hard way and just start hacking. I know it CAN be done. It’s basic engineering. Thing is how fast.
No worries, mate, as long as Zero is in charge.
long haul for a prop plane over hostile country
oh they have the engineers do it alright, my first post simply meant they have nothing in their inventory now... but if they want to do it bad enough they have the technology to make a 747 work
Missiles?
I am actually surprised. I mean we have done the stuff out the back thing for a while with bombs and cargo (airborne for a while now. The IAF is far from a 3rd world power. It seems strange they don’t.
Then again I guess they never figured on a long distance campaign when so many Muzzies come to their door to play.
i bet it's a hell of a kick in the pants for the crew when they do too!!!
No worries, mate, as long as Zero is in charge.
Don't be so hasty. He (or his handlers) haven't been shy about throwing our military around like political toys.
like what? a Saturn V5??? hell the US can't loft a 30,000lb cargo anymore...
if they had the C17 they could do it but they don't
I’m not familiar with from how high the thing needs to be dropped and guided from? Either really, really high and fast, or low and slow?
i guess my point is that is a LOOONG way to go over hostile territory in a slow moving airplane... they will put up everything they have as soon as they see it coming because it'll take a lot longer to get there and more chance to knock it down
no matter who tries it or how, they better bring a LOT of fighters
The higher and faster the better, I would imagine.
If we can give/sell them the big boom we ought to be able to spare one of those. I am not really familiar with it, but it’s basically just a jet cargo plane with no real black box stuff isn’t it? Probably some arms treaty BS to deal with...
my guess is, they don't buy any because they don't need them... the country is so small they can drive where ever they need to go and with only the occasional need for air transport the C130 fits the bill
I’ll jump in... the jews solved the first nuclear bomb. Then they invented the neutron bomb. Since then, how many technological cycles for improvement have there been?
I would suggest that when the chips are down, they will be showcasing technologies yet to be seen.
You have to keep in mind the Iranians are messing with the smartest people on the planet. Most ironic thing is they are proud they have assembled some bombs, old , discarded Jewish technology.
They repeatedly air dropped the Shuttle Enterprise from a modified 747 for approach and landing tests. A roughly 5x greater load than this bomb. Design a single use airframe around your penetrator bomb, perhaps with a propulsion package, that can be separated at an appropriate time. Might even provide a limited standoff capability. More complicated but more capable. You could have an even larger bomb, or trade size for standoff range. One problem would be how to secretly do adequate testing. I’d hate to depend on getting it right the first time. The other would be how to get your loaded 747 close enough. I doubt it would be very stealthy.
And the subsequent three thru fifteen just make me feel good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.