Posted on 05/04/2013 5:42:08 PM PDT by Hojczyk
A new poll from Emily’s List shows an overwhelming number of voters now support the idea. It’s a movement the group hopes someone in the sisterhood is about to inherit.
Stephanie Schriock, president of Emily’s List, which raises money and works to elect pro-choice Democratic women, said she has no inside knowledge of what Clinton is likely to do, but there is widespread acceptance of a woman as president, and 72 percent of voters surveyed think it’s likely to happen in 2016. While Clinton gets mentioned most, there’s no guarantee she will run, which is why Emily’s List wants to “ignite the conversation” around an idea whose time has come, and build a movement that Clinton or another in the sisterhood can inherit.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
Are you referring to the Bitch with the bloody hands?
Or the Secretary of State that accomplished NOTHING other than fly miles during her term in office?
Sarah Palin; yes. Hitlery Rotten Klintoon; NO!
When Bill Clinton was President they said he had a colonoscopy performed and they found Eleanor Clift’s
apartment.
1- NO ONE from "Emily's List". They are radical abortion promoters.
2- It must be a constitutional conservative woman.
3- Let's not have a repeat of the Obama phenomenon, when people vote for anyone just because they're a black/woman/whatever.
Hillary vs. Palin. If you’re going to get a woman, vote for the hot one. I think Nikki Haley would be better though.
Eleanor Clift is an ugly hag witch with beans for brains.
uses funded RAT poll information to feed the compliant MSM print...AND BADGER FACE Cliff complies...
“She would also be as corrupt and leftist as Obama.”
I think she’d be 10x worse, if she was POTUS, instead of 0scumbag.
No. Big “Sistah” Hillary will not pass up the chance to RULE over this country. In her testimony, she grabbed control of the discourse early on with her histrionics; became another person with the “goggle” glasses. As they did during the Clinton Assministration, lies and obfuscations were the order of the day in Benghazi. - Gag me with a spoon. - People aren’t able to connect the dots between Hillary’s brand of Socialism and the Marxist’s brand of Socialism. Consequently, we’ll probably get stuck, by hook or crook with Hillary. - See, she’s EARNED it.
Right...but a COMPETENT woman like Margret Thatcher or Golda Meir...NOT a grandstanding harridan like Hillirey Clintooon.
My, my, my...
There is widespread acceptance of a woman as president, that’s not a problem at all. The problem for the D’s will be to find a candidate without H’s heavy “baggage”
To the True Believers, it doesn’t so much matter that it’s a female, as long as it’s a female Communist they believe they can get elected.
And the superior minds of the female subspecies will gladly comply - although, not gladly enjoy their inclusion in the Muslim harems, nor the Party’s possession of their children.
Or maybe they will. Maybe that’s what women really want, and the vote was the way to get it.
I was ready for Sarah in 2008.
Heck...I would have voted for Jeanne Kirkpatrick.
Uh huh ...
Haley does not have the experience and she’s borderline RINO. Stick with real conservatives who have executive experience.
Most Republicans were hoping for a woman to run last election. It wasn’t because of what she had between her legs but what she has between her ears.
Pray for America to Wake up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.