Posted on 05/04/2013 8:37:07 PM PDT by silentknight
Edited on 05/04/2013 9:50:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
If true, prayers up for the safety of Israel.
Ping to 10
Whispers in the Pentagon and elsewhere in official Washington seem to indicate the Israelis may wait to launch massive airstrikes against Iranian nuclear sites until at least after the elections this summer in Iran.....
Thus, if the rumors in Washington are true... (and not disinformation designed to mask a sooner attack),.... it would suggest before the Israelis start a new regional war they want to assess — and be seen assessing — whether Iran’s new government will maintain its hardline pursuit of nuclear weapons,..... or whether it would be willing to negotiate and give up the country’s atomic ambitions.
But even while being as patient as possible, Netanyahu cannot ignore Iranian efforts to beef up the missile forces of Hezbollah, the implosion inside Syria, the danger of Syria WMD being used or being transferred to jihadists, and the steady Iranian march towards The Bomb.
The airstrikes in the last 48 hours help him send a message that his patience is running out, and that the Israelis have very precise intelligence on what Iran and its allies are up to............
((early reports indicate they bombed storehouses for advanced missiles that the Assad regime was preparing to transfer to the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terror group in Lebanon.))
One thing is clear:..... Netanyahu is not waiting any longer for Obama to act. Israel is taking the lead in protecting its own national security.
Joel Rosenberg
Interesting comments on the site. I take it this is a Russian site?
> Joel Rosenberg
Are you Joel Rosenburg... or just copying something he wrote?
(I would be unsurprised if Mr. Rosenburg were a Freeper.)
I get His e-mails from his web site..blog etc. I generally want to see what he has to say on issues concerning Israel.
As you might know he once worked with Bibi and knows him personally....as do many of the ‘better’ politicians in Washington.
So when he mentions “whispers” likely he's heard something from those within... but is not authorized to confirm information... rather frames his opinion.
I'll be careful next time, and here after, to bracket his name.
Ah, it's ok.
I'll be careful next time, and here after, to bracket his name.
Or you can use <blockquote> to inset the text.
Like this.
Like this?
<”When it comes to serial killers and mass shooters, the media is conditioned to look for a break that follows some life crisis. But with Muslim terrorists there is no discontinuity, only continuity. A few setbacks might have made terrorism more appealing to Tamerlan, but that would not have happened if it had not already been on his menu of life choices. Or that of his brother.”>
Or just his name?
I hope you will forgive me if I don’t believe that.
thank you. I learn something new everyday
Oops, my-bad, the actual syntax is <blockquote>
Some content
</blockquote>
I'd put everything in the blockquote.
That’s okay - I haven’t studied it so it is perhaps a faulty interpretation. But the two events are linked, and seeing as Damascus has never been turned into an uninhabited wasteland (yet), it would seem that the prophecy is not referring to something that has already happened. It also seems that most interpreters view these verses as “end time” prophecies.
Amazing to be living in these days, isn’t it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.