Who can post the “Ha-Ha” graphic? Most appropriate.
The Obama administration is implementing the Kyoto treaty and the Copenhagen accords without any Congressional ratification, hearings or enabling legislation. Rules and regulations are propagated by ideologues at EPA, Dept. of Energy and many other Federal agencies with administrative powers. They are preventing real economic expansion and are causing real misery. These ideologues of course never suffer. If they are thrown out of office they will simply return to tenured positions at tax supported universities or tax exempted “non profits” and foundations. A big price is being paid for shoddy science.
Nah. "Cause"? "Effect"? That's for deniers and anti-science Republicans, who are certainly not smart enough to know that both of these, for example, must be true:
Gorebull warming we can survive, Another ice age? Not a chance. A lot of us will die.
http://theolympiareport.com/wwu-scientist-debunks-lawmakers-myths-about-co2-climate-change/
contrary to reports of global warming, the earths temperature has actually been gradually cooling for the past 15 years as part of a regular 30-year heating-and-cooling cycle that has been observed for the past 500 years;
the Antarctic ice sheet is growing, not receding;
sea level is increasing by an imperceptible 7 inches per century, not the 20 inches thats been reported;
snowfall isnt decreasing in fact, in four of the past five years, record snowfall levels have been reported;
carbon-dioxide not only isnt causing global warming but it is physically impossible it ever could;
severe weather patterns are not becoming common; and,
the oceans are not becoming dangerously acidic.
If CO2 is indeed plant food, and we (humans) are purposely (or not) reducing CO2 emissions, what does that indicate for the long-term supply of global plant food? Hmmmmmmmmmmm??
It’s now “climate change”. If the climate changes, they’re proven right. Like, if the wind blows or it snows, hey that’s climate change, right? So they win.
The increased Natural Gas production and demand can be shown to reduce the amount of CO2 released, but the oil only moved the location of production.