Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Are the War Criminals in Syria?
Townhall.com ^ | May 7, 2013 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 05/07/2013 9:44:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

Last week, several polls came out assessing U.S. public opinion on intervention in Syria.

According to the Huffington Post poll, Americans oppose U.S. air strikes on Syria by 3-to-1. They oppose sending arms to the rebels by 4-to-1. They oppose putting U.S. ground troops into Syria by 14-to-1. Democrats, Republicans and independents are all against getting involved in that civil war that has produced 1.2 million refugees and 70,000 dead.

A CBS/New York Times poll found that by 62-to-24 Americans want to stay out of the Syrian war. A Reuters/Ipsos poll found that by 61-to-10 Americans oppose any U.S. intervention.

But the numbers shift when the public is asked if it would make a difference if the Syrian regime used poison gas. In that case, opposition to U.S. intervention drops to 44-to-27 in Reuters/Ipsos.

Yet on the Sunday talk shows and cable news, the hawks are over-represented. To have a senator call for arming the rebels and U.S. air strikes is a better ratings "get" than to have on a senator who wants to stay out of the war.

In that same CBS poll, however, the 10 percent of all Americans who say they follow the Syrian situation closely were evenly divided, 47-to-48, on whether to intervene.

The portrait of America that emerges is of a nation not overly interested in what is going on in Syria, but which overwhelmingly wants to stay out of the war.

But it is also a nation whose foreign policy elites are far more interventionist and far more supportive of sending weapons to the rebels and using U.S. air power. From these polls, it is hard not to escape the conclusion that the Beltway elites who shape U.S. foreign policy no longer represent the manifest will of Middle America.

America has not gone isolationist, but has become anti-interventionist. This country does not want its soldiers sent into any more misbegotten adventures like Iraq and Afghanistan, and does not see any vital national interest in who comes out on top in Syria.

But who is speaking up for that great silent majority? Who in the U.S. Senate is on national TV standing up to the interventionists?

Who in the Republican Party is calling out the McCainiacs?

Another story that came out this weekend, smothered by news of Israeli air strikes on Syrian military installations and missile depots, might cool elite enthusiasm -- and kill any public desire to intervene.

"Syrian Rebels May Have Used Sarin Gas," ran the headline in Monday's New York Times. Datelined Geneva, the story began:

"United Nations human rights investigators have gathered testimony from casualties of Syria's civil war and medical workers indicating that rebel forces have used the nerve agent sarin, one of the lead investigators said Sunday."

The U.N. commission has found no evidence that the Syrian army used chemical weapons. But Carla Del Ponte, a former Swiss attorney general and a commission member, stated:

"Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals, and according to their report of last week, which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated.

"This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels."

In short, the war criminals may be the people on whose behalf we are supposed to intervene. And if it was the rebels who used sarin gas, and not the forces of President Bashar Assad, more than a few questions arise that need answering.

For just two weeks ago, the White House informed Congress:

"Our intelligence community does assess, with varying degrees of confidence, that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin."

A clamor then arose demanding Obama make good on his threat that the Syrian regime's use of poison gas would cross a "red line" and be a "game changer," calling forth "enormous consequences."

If the Syrian military did not use sarin, but the rebels did, who in the U.S. intelligence community blew this one? From whom did U.S. agencies get their evidence that sarin had been used by Damascus? Were we almost suckered by someone's latest lies about weapons of mass destruction into fighting yet another unnecessary war?

When allegations of the Syrian government's use of sarin arose, many in Congress, especially in the Republican Party, denounced Obama for fecklessness in backing off of his "red line" threat.

It now appears that Obama may have saved us from a strategic disaster by not plunging ahead with military action. And the question should be put to the war hawks:

If Assad's use of sarin should call forth U.S. air strikes, ought not the use of sarin by the rebels, if confirmed, cause this country to wash its hands of those war criminals?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; carladelponte; iran; lebanon; maheralassad; randsconcerntrolls; thebrotherdidit

1 posted on 05/07/2013 9:44:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

All of them?


2 posted on 05/07/2013 9:46:57 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There are really three wars occuring in Syria....and six players...as well those who are fighting for no reason other than make a living.


3 posted on 05/07/2013 9:47:15 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Let the Muzzies kill each other and may the survivors start their own government without U.S. financial support.


4 posted on 05/07/2013 9:47:50 AM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Who Are the War Criminals in Syria?

The last one standing.

5 posted on 05/07/2013 9:48:32 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I highly doubt that either side would use weapons of mass destruction in this conflict... unless they have some.


6 posted on 05/07/2013 9:51:49 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But wait Juan McCain and Obama wants us in this mess so bad they can taste it.

This blew back in Obama face. He established a red line. The Rebels heard about it and used the gas to get Obama into this. Then we find the truth before Obama could send in the planes.


7 posted on 05/07/2013 10:02:39 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The opposition movement in Syria is not indigenous, it’s backed by international banking, which uses US and European forces to go to war on its behalf from time to time.

It’s brought to us by the same interests that backed all the “arab spring” revolts.

The object is to get the targeted nations to come into the sphere of “normal Western banking”, i.e., submitting to the IMF/BIS central banking model.

Saudia Arabia, Dubai, etc., are vassals of these banking interests; they will not be bothered by such revolutions as long as they stay in line.

It’s important to international banking be able to maintain its control that every nation submit to buying US Treasuries, dealing with US dollars, etc.


8 posted on 05/07/2013 10:34:07 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
♫ ♪I stay in the backwoods bracin'
waiting for the moment thats right
to exercise these war crimes
all alone in the dark of night ♫♪

9 posted on 05/07/2013 10:49:03 AM PDT by ▀udda▀udd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson