Just saw your ping. IMHO..biggest bombshells have been that not only was a stand down order given not to respond to attacks with military..a stand down order given to not attempt rescue of survivors. Also no authority sought to fly into Libya....no stenographers at ARB testimony of witnesses....Africom was not honest about assets in area at time.
Just a start...hope that helps. So many bombshells..I can’t recall them all right now.
The Repubs keep bring up “what difference does it make”......saying makes a BIG difference!
Also...another biggie..Hicks was threatened not to talk to Chaffetz when he went over on congressional fact finding mission and State department lawyer tried to muscle in on classified briefings against rules.
Also, Hicks was NEVER interviewed by FBI re:Benghazi, and it is VERY clear the 'Anti-Islam video' or 'protest' triggering the attack is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL MYTH FABRICATED FOR PURPOSE OF COVER-UP with no evidence supporting it anywhere. Even some of the Dems like Connolly are mystified by the video narrative.
This is interesting because AFRICOM's commander was in Washington was he not?
So who was Ham's second in command?