Posted on 05/13/2013 9:24:20 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
I enjoyed watching Ostumbles dig the hole a little deeper this morning. :-)
If he immediately called it a terrorist attack. Why all the discussion of a Youtube video? Why did he address the UN 9 days after, still talking about a meaningless Youtube video?
In seeing the entire Dem machine pushing back saying ‘nothing new’ that they know there is plenty new here, and that it contradicts their earlier positions. If there was nothing there, they would back off and let it go away.
Wake me up before you go go.
-PJ
Was he even at those daily briefings? My understanding is that he skips most of them.
Weak beer from The Dear Leader. Of course, he’s stonewalling. Rest of the day is going to be very interesting to see how the MSM reacts.
Will it be, “Uh, OK. That explains it all”?
OR, will they get curious enough to follow all the threads in this tapestry of malfeasance?
No one saw that Friday abc story coming. Just like nobody saw John Den coming.
Over an hour since the presser and no mention of it at nytimes.com—it must have been bad and it’s already buried!
I thought it was from Alice in Wonderland?
Pathetic excuse for a press conference. He allowed only one journalist to ask a question, then proceeded to run out the clock. I guess playing all that basketball has taught him something.
He of course made no such claim. He merely while blathering on about it as something other than a terrorist attack stated that any terrorist attacks (implied: that might occur) would be handled appropriately.
What a queer thing to say.
The only thing Obumble forgot to mention was what the meaning of “is” is.
Thought the exact same thing!
There is no there there for:
Benghazi
Fast and Furious
Supplying weapons to Syria
Birth Certificate
IRS harassing Conservatives
Death Panels in Health care
Muslim Killer at Ft. Hood
Ignoring the Russian warning about Bombers
illegal appointments to NLRB
I am sure I missed many.
HUH?
“The whole thing defies logic. And the fact that this keeps getting churned out, frankly, has a lot to do with political motivations. We’ve got folks who have challenged Hillary Clinton’s integrity, Susan Rice’s integrity, Mike Mullen and Tom Pickering’s integrity. It’s a given that mine gets challenged by these same folks. They’ve used it for fundraising,” he said, targeting Republicans for trying to gin up a controversy out of thin air.
“There’s no there there,” he said, pointing out that the emails cited in Friday’s report about the talking points being altered 12 times had been given to Congress months ago to review.
Obama said lawmakers concluded there was “nothing afoul” in the process to create the “so-called talking points.”
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Well, Hillary had said that she has better things to do on a Sunday than go on the Sunday news shows. And the MSM lapped it up as if that explains everything.
And Hillary told the congressional committee “what difference does it make”, and the MSM lapped it up as if that explained things.
If we had any semblance of a free press, a media not in bed with Democrats, news stories would be covered very differently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.