Posted on 05/14/2013 9:33:10 AM PDT by pabianice
Edited on 05/14/2013 10:04:58 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
[original thread incorrectly states Holder has recused himself from IRS investigation--Mod]
“Well RECUSE Meeeeee!”
~Steve Martin
Just like headless chickens!
They are SO lucky this isn’t just after the French Revolution.
Yes Praise God!
How about “HOLDER RESIGNS”, that F’ing idiot. ‘Contempt of Congress’ and he still has his job?
Kickoff!
The Fish Rots from the head down....
Bachmann was right. Team 0bama is using this IRS scandal to wipe Benghazi off the radar screen. Team 0bama will avoid Benghazi at all costs.. That the weapons Doherty and Woods were killed with, were weapons supplied to the bad guys by Team 0bama in Benghazi.
BTTT!
You're right Rummy...
Nothing ‘breaking’ like this on CNN online. Their headline is “Feds want lower DUI standard”. The crisis of the day is DUIs not IRS according to them
“this could be Dear Leader’s way of getting rid of the Bush appointee at the IRS,,”
Word is that the Bush appointee was a democrtic donor.
Malignant Narcissists are like that
They will burn down the country that rejects them
Keep your powder dry
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Appendix%20VI%20and%20Appendix%20VII.PDF
Notice the redacted bits (notice also the ABC link). We need the original.
If anyone finds it, please post link and ping me.
Thanks.
Nothing ‘breaking’ like this on CNN online. Their headline is “Feds want lower DUI standard”. The crisis of the day is DUIs not IRS according to them
“Obtaining AP phone records required Holder’s approval”
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obtaining-ap-phone-records-required-holders-approval/article/2529585
They might try, but I’ve seen no evidence that it will work.
According to DoJ rules, he had to be involved.
The AG is required to personally approve investigations involving the media.
Excuse me, but I’m not sure what this means? He’s recusing himself from taking part in any investigation? How is that possible when HE probably ordered or approved the IRS and AP directives. Please, someone explain, exactly what this means?
Excuse me, but I’m not sure what this means? He’s recusing himself from taking part in any investigation? How is that possible when HE probably ordered or approved the IRS and AP directives. Please, someone explain, exactly what this means?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.