Posted on 05/19/2013 5:11:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Edited on 05/19/2013 5:12:37 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
"The only thing new in the world is the history you don't know," said Harry Truman, who made it his task to absorb a lot of it. Many people who have not followed his example are not averse to using what little they do know, with the inadvertent effect of exposing how much they have to learn.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
This whole mess is like an after image of the Nixon cover-up and irs scandals.
It is far worse than Nixon even if all the liberal news media said about Nixon were true but the media would never slander , lie about or smear Republicans would they ? of course look at how they lied about and smeared Palin , Bush and we have an Internet and SOME conservative media to counter what the media does and still the news media demonized Palin and Bush . Nixon didn't have an Internet nor Conservative media to counter the news media claims so in my thinking I thing the media slandered Nixon
That comports well with the articles of impeachment which said that Nixon endeavored to use the IRS. News articles reported that Nixon talked about using the IRS. Those damn tapes again.
In the old days it was what they did.. dirty tricks;
but they knew that there was a limit. We disputed what that limit was but IIRC no one went anywhere near violating the public trust as Obama has gone. (With the possible exception of LBJ but that was just plain corruption and crime.)
In Politics, Scamps, Saboteurs and the Occasional Criminal
"Of course, the nature and seriousness of political mischief runs a wide gamut and elicits varied interpretations. Lines are blurred, breached. One man (say, Nixon) might see a clever campaign tactic, while someone else (say, an opponent) might see a 'dirty trick,' while someone else still (say, a Watergate prosecutor) might see criminality."
Read about the Democrat who inspired Nixon's "dirty tricks." The Nytimese do not reveal that bit of information in their article but it was widely reported back then. Nixon wanted a dirty trickster like the Democrats' Dick Tuck.
Donald Segretti was recruited to be Nixon's Tuck. Years later it would be noted that Lee Atwater's "place [is] secure in the annals of conservative shenanigans."
Actually, Nixon himself was audited!
That's all well and good to try and avoid the Nixon comparison, but it's a failed "try" when you consider the contrast with Sarah Ingram, head of the IRS dept in question that got $100,000-plus in bonuses and was promoted to do the same with the new Affordable-Care unit within the IRS.
The problem with this RCP piece is we know now what Nixon said and wrote inside the Oval Office in the late 1960s and early 1970s. We only know what BHO said in public. We do not know what BHO said and wrote in the Oval Office. We do however know that the underlings in Cincinnati are saying that everything they did was ordered by IRS headquarters. Does anyone believe that fool former acting commissioner Miller thought this up on his own?
The equivalence is false - because Obama’s crimes are far worse than Nixon’s.
So this jackass writer wants to compare what we knew about Nixon after years of investigation to what is now known about the current scandals?
Hey! I’m running out of popcorn awaiting the MSM
to pick up on the lawsuit reported in the Wash. Times
that the IRS released 60 million health records of 10 million taxpayers.
Maybe that will be the icing on the Obamacare cake!
So... he’s comparing a public statement by Obama (who is a liar, let’s remember) with a candid remark by Nixon captured on the Oval Office tapes?
Let’s hear some tapes of Obama’s private conversations, and then we have a fair comparison. This guy is a real tool.
And, yes, this is very much like Watergate.
Whatever else came in his political career, Richard Nixon had already served his country.
I’ll cut Nixon some slack since Whittaker Chambers liked him, and he helped to bring down the left’s god, Alger Hiss. The left will never forgive him for that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.