Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Can't Forget That Oklahoma's Senators Voted Against Sandy Relief
Yahoo News ^ | 5/21/2013 | Alexander Abad-Santos

Posted on 05/21/2013 12:45:54 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: 3Fingas

Pretty sure that’s what I said in post #9...

“inflated their $10B in damages to a $60B political payoff”


81 posted on 05/21/2013 4:15:52 PM PDT by G Larry (Darkness Hates the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Right, you are.


82 posted on 05/21/2013 4:22:12 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Was he trying to taunt him?

It was one of those weird Shep moments. He came on in the next hour still talking about it being cold and he had on a jacket. However, a little over an hour later, he came on just in shirt sleeves but still talking about it being cold out so he must have gotten a phone call. Then, he came on again and brought up the man without a jacket and that he'd told him to go down about three blocks and the Red Cross would get him set up with a jacket in his size. Hubby, who hadn't been watching the original interview asked why he kept talking about jackets. It was all very strange but it was obvious he had been talked to.

83 posted on 05/21/2013 4:57:24 PM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hahaha, five minutes ago Shep was still in shirt sleeves but the reporter now (don’t know his name) has on a jacket.


84 posted on 05/21/2013 5:05:33 PM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Not many, from the looks of things.


85 posted on 05/21/2013 6:13:15 PM PDT by left that other site ((Ban the ubiquitous and deadly solvent, Di-hydrogen monoxide!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bgill

My cousin managed to rescue her two-day old grandson and several other people by driving alongside the path of the tornado for several miles till she found the home of a friend with an underground shelter.

And she managed to catch a video of the funnel cloud on her cell phone as she was driving.

And she has already posted it on FB.

That’s the kind of people live in OK.


86 posted on 05/21/2013 6:16:53 PM PDT by left that other site ((Ban the ubiquitous and deadly solvent, Di-hydrogen monoxide!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

My son was supposed to go to Moore to get some 4H pigs Thursday. They called the guy and he said that the tornado barely missed him but not to come until Saturday because he will be busy helping the clean up.


87 posted on 05/21/2013 7:48:18 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

“However, sometimes, the Federal Government is the best source of rescue assets and immediate medical assistance.”

This is exactly why you should be opposed to it up front! The state, county and municipality should have the resources instead of having to plead with the fedgov for it. They are the closest to the issue and should be able to handle it best! We should be self-sustaining, but we aren’t; this is specifically because the fedgov wants all of us to be subservient to it.

The main reason states are running shortfalls and have all of the red tape they do is because we fall in lockstep with the idea that an all-encompassing fedgov should help us in times of need. “Times of need” has grwon into an ever expanding, nay, nearly all-encompassing state these days.

If the fedgov were to stick to its role (which is ultimately very limited - or it at least used to be until we all got complacent) along with the citizens keeping to their role of ensuring that government in all shapes isn’t over-reaching, then we don’t need to have this subservient dependence on the fedgov to begin with.

We really shouldn’t be where we are today. Sandy relief should’ve never gotten off the ground to begin with, especially in the shape it ultimately took (a ton of lard for much to do with anything but Sandy victim recovery)!

Sandy victim recovery should’ve been left to those few things that were directly related to the fed gov. (Federal assets used to make federal losses whole again - things like interstate roadways, federal buildings, port issues, etc...)

The Oklahoma Senators voted correctly on this...

The American people can do much better, but the will is gone, we have been drained by being separated, marginalized and alinskied since well before the 60’s. Our moral compass is broken and our ability to pull out of the miasma that is gutter politics; as well as the mainstreaming of moral decay may finally prove to be our downfall.

When I talk about gutter politics, I hope you understand that I am referring to political correctness, alinsky tactics, communism, the dumbing down of education, et al...


88 posted on 05/21/2013 8:37:00 PM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

All good points. You are preaching to the choir. The Federal Government should have a more limited role in all areas of our public life.

The local authorities should be the primary actors in natural disasters; however, there are some cases where the Federal Government can and should help. I am not talking about porkulus economic relief, I am referring to rescue assets that local authorities may not have. The Federal Government often has to provide this assistance when local authorities can’t or won’t do their job. I don’t see this as a problem for the people of Oklahoma.

God bless the people of Oklahoma and I wish them a speedy recovery from this terrible disaster.


89 posted on 05/22/2013 6:07:10 AM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson