Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lmo56

Her statements were general and offered no substance for any specific line of questioning.

She can take the 5th on any or every specific question.


413 posted on 05/23/2013 8:54:14 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

You are not as smart as I had hoped you would be


421 posted on 05/23/2013 10:49:44 AM PDT by Syncro ("So?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Lerner said she broke no IRS regulation. If they find that she broke even one - even such as taking office supplies for personal use, she can be questioned about it. She had no 5th Amendment protection for that since she had declared that she broke no regulation. She would also be open to perjury since she was under oath.

Obviously, the above is an absurd case, but if there is a significant regulation broken, she is in deep doo-doo ...


424 posted on 05/23/2013 11:15:16 AM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson