Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder signed off on warrant for James Rosen records
Hot Air ^ | May 23, 2013 | Mary Katherine Ham

Posted on 05/23/2013 5:08:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Shot: President Obama’s speech today:

Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs. Our focus must be on those who break the law. That is why I have called on Congress to pass a media shield law to guard against government over-reach. I have raised these issues with the Attorney General, who shares my concern. So he has agreed to review existing Department of Justice guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters, and will convene a group of media organizations to hear their concerns as part of that review. And I have directed the Attorney General to report back to me by July 12th.

Chaser: NBC News:

Attorney General Eric Holder signed off on a controversial search warrant that identified Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “possible co-conspirator” in violations of the Espionage Act and authorized seizure of his private emails, a law enforcement official told NBC News on Thursday.

The disclosure of the attorney general’s role came as President Barack Obama, in a major speech on his counterterrorism policy, said Holder had agreed to review Justice Department guidelines governing investigations that involve journalists.

“I am troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable,” Obama said. “Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs.”

Will Sec. Holder be recusing himself from the review he’ll be doing of practices at DOJ relating to media?

In the fever swamps on the right, some wonder how high up this approval went....

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ap; bhodoj; dprk; ericholder; espionage; foxnews; holder; intimidation; jamesrosen; msm; northkorea; obama; perjury; shieldlaw; shieldlawscam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: andyk

If Holder and liberals are pushing for a law to ‘remedy’ this situation - one they created - then we better look very carefully at that law. It’s probably bad news.


21 posted on 05/24/2013 3:00:17 AM PDT by GOPJ (It's Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to "See. I Told You So!"- Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: andyk

If Holder and liberals are pushing for a law to ‘remedy’ this situation - one they created - then we better look very carefully at that law. It’s probably bad news.

That said, many prayers for James Rosen and his loved ones.


22 posted on 05/24/2013 3:01:17 AM PDT by GOPJ (It's Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to "See. I Told You So!"- Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

it’s the Limbaugh theorem in action. All Obama wants to do is to hamstring the next administration’s ability to punish leakers, which they have done with impunity.


23 posted on 05/24/2013 3:06:32 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
The sheer audacity of this man! HIS government over-reaches then asked for a law to prevent HIS government over-reach.

Holder and liberals don't want this crisis wasted. The law Holder's talking about is one LIBERAL members of the press have wanted passed for some time. Holder's trying to make it look like it's in response to the witch hunting he and his team did to a conservative journalists from FOX. It's not.

24 posted on 05/24/2013 3:07:30 AM PDT by GOPJ (It's Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to "See. I Told You So!"- Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: manc
Sorry.

I always laughed when Tiny Tom Daschle would proclaim that he was "deeply disturbed".

25 posted on 05/24/2013 4:18:14 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

a lynching is needed


26 posted on 05/24/2013 4:19:34 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....Obama Denies Role in Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
and He’ll replace Holder with Deval Patrick. Maybe.

Deval Patrick is less competent than Holder. But, that won't be an improvement, because he's an Obama mini-me and will do whatever Valerie Jarrett suggests.

27 posted on 05/24/2013 5:15:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

That’s the word on the street, though.. It would take a tornado to remove Holder because he’s probably got alotta dirt on 0bama. Not to mention he’s got a few more hours to put in at the SuperShredder500.


28 posted on 05/24/2013 8:42:22 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
It would take a tornado to remove Holder because he’s probably got alotta dirt on 0bama.

Yes, if he were removed against his will. But, he might just go along with a lateral move to another agency. Let's see, where could an Obama loyalist do a lot of damage--maybe the NSA? Or, he could go into private sector legal practice and monetize his connections.

29 posted on 05/24/2013 8:50:34 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; manc

” I always laughed when Tiny Tom Daschle would proclaim that he was “deeply disturbed”. “

“deeply disturbed”.

The only honest thing he ever said.


30 posted on 05/24/2013 9:38:57 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There has been a question raised if Holder lied to the House in light of his signing the Rosenberg search warrant. I don’t think he did. He said he hadn’t been invovled in the “prosecution” of reporters and that wouldbe wrong. He wasn’t since Rosenberg hasn’t been prosecuted just investigated. I do wonder what the judge thinks about the warrant he approved on this very serious national security issue where theyaccording to Holder had no intention of prosecuting him. Also, since not all the phones were Rosens how did DOJ justify seizing those records per this search warrant? Did they lie to the judge, is there another warrant sordid they exceed the warrant. FOX and Rosenberg might want to inquire


31 posted on 05/24/2013 12:30:30 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.


32 posted on 05/24/2013 7:21:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson