[E. Pluribus Unum]

I wouldn't be surprised to see some Democratic judge still declare the kiddie porn inadmissible because someone forgot a staple in the search warrant request. This whole thing will be quietly forgotten.

The first warrant didn't cover kiddie pron. They went back and got a second warrant after they discovered it under the first warrant.

Going back to get a second warrant is a sham. If they can get a second warrant to cover anything they find that wasn't covered by the first warrant, then the whole purpose of warrants is defeated and you have no fourth amendment rights against unlimited search and seizure.

Although in your mind I am sure there is a kiddie pron exception to the fourth amendment right there in that living document, the US Constitution.

[CedarDave]

Going back to get a second warrant is a sham. If they can get a second warrant to cover anything they find that wasn't covered by the first warrant, then the whole purpose of warrants is defeated and you have no fourth amendment rights against unlimited search and seizure.

If they find evidence of a serious crime while executing the first search warrant, are they supposed to forget about it? Any lawyers on here sort it out?