Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem. Senator disputes Obama’s claim that Congress was briefed
The Hill ^ | 06/07/13 | Jonathan Easley

Posted on 06/07/2013 5:40:01 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: neverdem

Mike Lee “Hadn’t Been Briefed” But Obama Says “Trust Us”

http://spectator.org/blog/2013/06/07/mike-lee-hadnt-been-briefed-bu

Senator Mike Lee, held a press conference to say that they had not been briefed on the NSA phone metadata dragnet.


21 posted on 06/07/2013 7:17:41 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Okay, I’m starting to lean toward the “Obama has no idea what’s going on” side of the analysis.


22 posted on 06/07/2013 7:33:51 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

He can’t be bothered with the details. He would rather play golf and vacation.

I think he truly doesn’t know a lot of this...

I also think that someone is throwing Obambi under the bus.


23 posted on 06/07/2013 7:49:47 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?
Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe? Is it safe?


OBAMA-RIGGING AMERICA




24 posted on 06/07/2013 7:59:48 PM PDT by devolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I’m becoming more and more convinced that the office of “president” is about as meaningful as Queen of England. He’s nothing more than a figurehead.... People are going to find out that presidents have little to do with anything these days.


25 posted on 06/07/2013 8:08:11 PM PDT by kjam22 (my newest music video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7gNI9bWO3s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I vacillate between the two extremes on this, but his background of never having done anything at all keeps bringing me back to it. He’s an ideological Leftist to his core, but he is not calling the shots in the least. He went to bed on Benghazi, and generally just reads what is put in front of him.


26 posted on 06/07/2013 8:18:25 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oops, Jeff just got put on THE list.


27 posted on 06/07/2013 8:28:00 PM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
I’m becoming more and more convinced that the office of “president” is about as meaningful as Queen of England. He’s nothing more than a figurehead.... People are going to find out that presidents have little to do with anything these days.

These leaders deflect attention away from Soros and his Bilderburg buddies. No one looks at the puppet master when there is an animated puppet clowning around front and center.

28 posted on 06/07/2013 8:38:41 PM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Malto meal.


29 posted on 06/07/2013 8:41:40 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Okay, sorry....delete this...”HOLY SHIT”!


30 posted on 06/07/2013 8:46:45 PM PDT by IrishPennant (Excuse me...Here's your nose. I found it in my business....agian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I guess Nancy P knew too. Remember when she said “everyone knows Mitt Romney won’t be president?” with that smirk on her face. What did she know? They are all criminals.


31 posted on 06/07/2013 8:56:11 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

...................I don’t know how many people knew about it in Congress, but I suspect a very small number on the Intelligence Committee, so when the president says all members of Congress were briefed … well, I think a very small number of Senators in Congress had full details on these programs,” Merkley said...................

Ok Merkley, where’ve ya been these past four years? Sitting on the toilet in the House chamber, waiting for some other wimp to ask a question????


32 posted on 06/07/2013 9:10:12 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Thanks for the link.


33 posted on 06/07/2013 9:15:42 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

CYA. Wonder how they’re going to slap down the back benchers who open their traps.


34 posted on 06/07/2013 9:22:55 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This is a big can of worms being opened up here. Obama makes it sound like the feds get access only to phone numbers and call data after a judge signs off. This is partially true and a smokescreen. But I think some have direct access to the switches and the data and content - all of it - all of the time. ... then who all has access to the pipes and what all did they do with the data? was this just CIA and FBI looking at the info or did political apparatus have access. inquiring minds want to know
35 posted on 06/07/2013 9:34:09 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Heads...pikes.


36 posted on 06/07/2013 9:36:20 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Anyone else seen this?

"Seriously dangerous times ahead. Deadly times. War, and censorship under the color of authority and under the pretext of of national security"

DHS insider: It’s about to get very ugly

37 posted on 06/07/2013 11:07:38 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Anyone think the Clintons are the ones behind the leaks? There’s a mountain of information coming out...somehow.


38 posted on 06/07/2013 11:10:40 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Didn’t Bo get authority to shut down cell phones and internet not long ago?

If communication can be cut for the sake of so called national security...as in Boston...could it not be done nationwide?

The article is interesting...but sounds like the Ulsterman sort of thing....still...I do believe taking down this country is in full swing regardless.


39 posted on 06/07/2013 11:27:40 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

RE: DHS insider

I just read it from your link. I’m not sure what to make of it. In a way, it sounds a little bit like the “Ulsterman” WH insider thing. Ulsterman has pretty much been discredited as far as I know, but his stuff still came fairly close to the truth in some cases.

Even if the author here is giving it straight, there is no way to tell whether or not he is being played by his “source.” Why would the DHS source go to this particular author?

I personally think the best I can do is take in the information, apply a little skepticism and be on the lookout for other information that confirms or contradicts.


40 posted on 06/07/2013 11:33:40 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson