Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southern Baptists consider resolution on scouting
WOWK ^

Posted on 06/12/2013 8:45:47 AM PDT by Morgana

HOUSTON (AP) - Southern Baptist Convention leaders have proposed a resolution expressing their opposition to the Boy Scouts of America's new policy allowing gay Scouts.

The resolution also calls on the Boy Scouts to remove from executive and board leadership the individuals who earlier sought to allow gays as both members and leaders without consulting the many religious groups that sponsor Scout troops.

While the resolution does not recommend that Southern Baptists drop ties with the Scouts, it expresses support for those churches and families that decide to do so.

It also encourages churches and families who choose to remain with the Scouts to work toward the reversal of the new membership policy.

Delegates to the annual meeting of the nation's largest Protestant denomination will vote on the resolution on Wednesday in Houston.

(Excerpt) Read more at wowktv.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baptist; boyscouts; bsa; catholic; homosexualagenda; mormons; sbc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Oak Grove

“If the Southern Baptist Convention endorses individuals and Churches that remain part of the BSA, then the Southern Baptists are endorsing homosexual behavior.”

I so agree! If any of their churches have the BSA in them then they are doing just that!!!


21 posted on 06/12/2013 9:13:11 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
That is the problem, they should be able to tell them....In our church if a Bishop says it is not going to happen in our parishes then you better believe it will not happen. In the long run it would save a lot of people a lot of trouble.

Well, at a minimum it would get the trains to run on time!

22 posted on 06/12/2013 9:13:57 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Exactly! I never thought that I would live to see the da when my church would be having this conversation. God has to be so sad.


23 posted on 06/12/2013 9:19:02 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
In our church if a Bishop says it is not going to happen in our parishes then you better believe it will not happen.

The "Bishops" of the BSA are saying that homosexuality is going to happen. In this case the apparently impregnable "Bishops" are the problem.

24 posted on 06/12/2013 9:21:00 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“That is the problem, they should be able to tell them.”

Baptist churches are all independent. The SBC exists to combine resources for seminaries and missionary work. If they tried to claim authority to demand anything, all member congregations would leave.


25 posted on 06/12/2013 9:21:50 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

flda already practice polygamy, the law means nothing to them.
Mainstream mormons have polygamy now, it is called celestial marriage.
Mainstream mormons have along term strategy on this issue.


26 posted on 06/12/2013 9:27:44 AM PDT by svcw (If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren't you alive when it starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oak Grove
I recommend that the Baptists merge with the Episcopal Church.

Hilarious.

Isaiah 10
Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed;

Romans 28
For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.

27 posted on 06/12/2013 9:32:42 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

That didn’t take long, now did it?

What does this article have to do with Catholics? ;)


28 posted on 06/12/2013 9:47:54 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Un Pere, Une Mere, C'est elementaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“That is the problem, they should be able to tell them.”

That dog would not hunt.

Although we are much more independent than your church it is impossible to place people in the SB Convention who would railroad change which is not wanted.


29 posted on 06/12/2013 10:07:37 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This fight is not over from what I can see. It is possible that some churches are going to be working to overturn the board and the policy in the future.


30 posted on 06/12/2013 10:18:18 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I had hopes for the churches. Not so much now. Bunch of sinners working aginst the teachings of the church. Make a clean split with the scouts and be done with it.


31 posted on 06/12/2013 10:22:11 AM PDT by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; Morgana
That didn’t take long, now did it? What does this article have to do with Catholics? ;)

It didn't initially. Post #3 stated that a) the SBC was "caving", b) and then added "like the Mormons", inviting comparisons between religious organizations.

My #12, in response, pointed out how the different ecclesial structures operate, and then I invited comparisons as to how each group (SBC, LDS, and RC) have behaved predictably (or not) in the political theater.

Within three minutes of my post #12, the poster of #3 responded to post #10 that c) the SBC "should be able to tell them what to do", using the example of her own Catholic bishop's authority to illustrate.

That's how Catholicism entered into it, as far as I can tell. FWIW, I see nothing wrong with a poster of one religious persuasion posting news or information about people in another religious persuasion. How about you?

32 posted on 06/12/2013 10:24:56 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bgill

“Make a clean split with the scouts and be done with it.”

That is what I say! None of this so called “talk”, just say “it over, good bye nice knowing you”.


33 posted on 06/12/2013 10:27:09 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

“What does this article have to do with Catholics? ;)”

I was merely stating that in our church the if the Bishop said no scouts in the parishes then there will be none. End of story. It should be the same with the Southern Baptists, but apparently it is not the case for what ever reason. So the “main church” can say “no scouts” but the individual churches may still have them if they choose. I don’t understand because I am not Southern Baptist, but then again...I won’t have boi scouts in my parish. :)


34 posted on 06/12/2013 10:31:08 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

agreed but then again when they have the ruling elitist class in DC who do this type of thing at their cocktail parties then I ma not surprised at how much the homostapo goes after groups which have values, morals and a sense of hard work


35 posted on 06/12/2013 10:43:58 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Still no mention of Catholicism until you posted.

You wouldn’t happen to have an.. Agenda? now would you?

The topic of this thread is the SBC. Perhaps you should discuss them.


36 posted on 06/12/2013 10:45:19 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Un Pere, Une Mere, C'est elementaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Still no mention of Catholicism until you posted. You wouldn’t happen to have an.. Agenda? now would you? The topic of this thread is the SBC. Perhaps you should discuss them.

LOL

37 posted on 06/12/2013 10:49:40 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
This fight is not over from what I can see. It is possible that some churches are going to be working to overturn the board and the policy in the future.

The fight is over. BSA has succumbed to the Cultural Marxists who also now are residing in the corporate offices of the Fortune 500. This issue has been thoroughly discussed on FR for ~3 weeks since the 5/23/2013 vote. Time to get on board with creating a new Scouting movement for male youth in the U.S. with http://www.onmyhonor.net/

38 posted on 06/12/2013 10:50:26 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; moovova; Oak Grove
Your comments are ill informed. I read the original news release which was posted. Sounds like something was lost in translation. I am awaiting the actual resolutions which will be posted straight from the horses' mouth.

http://www.baptistpress.org/

39 posted on 06/12/2013 10:56:04 AM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacNaughton

I absolutely approve of competing Scout organizations.


40 posted on 06/12/2013 11:32:03 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson