Skip to comments.
Climate change study is grim reading
Bangkok Post ^
| June 12, 2013
| by Bob Ward
Posted on 06/12/2013 3:34:34 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"...the average global temperature could be at least three degrees centigrade higher by the end of this century..."
Good Luck with that, Libtards.
2
posted on
06/12/2013 3:36:43 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(;-))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Excepting, of course, that “greenhouse gasses” are being spewed at alarming rates.....
.... and global temperatures are flat for 15 years (NYT).
3
posted on
06/12/2013 3:37:06 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(If youÂ’re happy and you know it clank your chains!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Think about it, do you really want global cooling and what that entails? Most of North America was an arctic region covered in ice 30,000 yrs ago.
4
posted on
06/12/2013 3:39:56 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“The planet has a fee-ver,” Almost President Gore.
To: central_va
I keep seeing the words might and could.
6
posted on
06/12/2013 3:44:28 PM PDT
by
corlorde
(forWARD of the state)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
That’s enough for me! In spite of evidence to the contrary!
On this flimsy “science”, let’s proceed post haste to wreck the economies of the developed world and redistribute their wealth to third-world dictators, under the direction of the UN, who of course will get their cut!
It’s a no-brainer!
7
posted on
06/12/2013 3:45:33 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: corlorde
Can you imagine the panic if the world was cooling every year and both ice caps were growing? My God, the horror.
8
posted on
06/12/2013 3:46:06 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Paladin2
Paladin2 ~:” “...the average global temperature could be at least three degrees centigrade higher by the end of this century...”
That assumes that all those experts know (?) that an increase in temperature resulted from increase from carbon dioxide.
The last I knew , it was universally accepted that we were in a ‘cooling cycle’, and have been for over 10 years.
This line of thought totally ignores the fact that methane in nature ( Siberia ) is being released into the atmosphere,
and is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
Also , it would be interesting to see who the funding sources are for all these scientists’ research .
9
posted on
06/12/2013 3:46:22 PM PDT
by
Tilted Irish Kilt
(" Criminals simply donÂ’t care if they break the law. " by Larry Correia)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"...the average global temperature could be at least three degrees centigrade higher by the end of this century..." And next January could be 8 degrees colder...or 4 degrees warmer...than normal in Milwaukee.
10
posted on
06/12/2013 3:48:07 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: central_va
Oh yeah, it would still be the fault of “climate change” and require a massive transfer of wealth to remedy, I’m sure.
11
posted on
06/12/2013 3:48:15 PM PDT
by
corlorde
(forWARD of the state)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
One would think that with the earth becoming warmer, growing seasons would be longer and the permafrost belt would recede, making for greater food production. But to leftists and liberals, more food being produced would be bad because it would contribute to the obesity problem.
12
posted on
06/12/2013 3:50:04 PM PDT
by
Fiji Hill
(Io Triumphe!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Please!!! Someone take away all my money and freedom before I destroy the planet!!
13
posted on
06/12/2013 3:50:12 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m still waiting for all you guys to pay me my carbon credits. What’s the problem?
14
posted on
06/12/2013 3:50:34 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climate change report is complete baloney.
15
posted on
06/12/2013 3:51:05 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
16
posted on
06/12/2013 3:51:32 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: dhs12345
All “255 scientific experts” can see no such thing.
17
posted on
06/12/2013 3:57:35 PM PDT
by
justrepublican
(Screaming a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
18
posted on
06/12/2013 3:59:37 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: justrepublican
Ya. No conflict of interest there. Move along, nothing to see.
19
posted on
06/12/2013 4:01:19 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As time goes on, the alarmist need to become more, and more detached from reality, and cling to their computer models. These models can not recreate historical temperatures, and their predictions did not accurately represent temperatures in the recent past, yet alarmist cling to the belief these same models accurately predict future temperatures. And for not believing in these models that seem to not be able to predict anything with any degree of accuracy, you are called 'anti-science'?!?
The theory of CO2 based climate change is in it's death throes. Here is an excellent presentation that was recently given in Hamburg by Dr. Murray Salby, Chair of Climate, Macquarie University in Australia.
The video starts with an introduction in German, but Dr Salby's presentation is in English. The really good parts are towards the end.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ROw_cDKwc0
20
posted on
06/12/2013 4:01:25 PM PDT
by
MMaschin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson