Posted on 06/13/2013 7:41:03 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
The consequences of guilt-free fornication - the one thing that has ruined marriage more than anything else.
And liberals cheer...
For some reason that I am pretty sure of, liberals really HATE white culture, and eliminating its influence is a utopian goal of theirs.
So, the challenge to them would be - provide an example of a non-white society that you’d prefer over America as a desirable place to live.
How many unmarried young men do you know? That is the key to these demographic trends.
NOT!
From what I’ve seen in some of the white trash neighborhoods around here, I suspect we’re gonna start catching-up real fast.
Plenty.
Guess what they say when asked?
“Why buy the cow when the milk is cheap, and free?”
And the women?
“Why buy the whole pig when all you want is the sausage?”
they would hate my county then.
over 90% white
republicans out number non party and Dems combined
less than half % of queers and muslims
99.5% speak English.
and we are not a small county either
http://enrnow.votesjc.com/FL/St_Johns/42920/112743/en/md.html?cid=0103
The real question is whether Latinos can run the US better than the countries they came from (Mexico, etc.).
When asked if I am MINORITY I will answer “Yes! Now give me my free stuff!.”
And the corresponding crime index is... what... 2?
(index of 100 based on a national average)
The ritualisation of premarital sex, making it a rite of passage for most Americans (and others) at a very young age has damaged marriage more than anything else, even homosexuality.
Societies that value intact families will undoubtedly dominate, over time. If there is one common social trait among successful societies world-over, it is the institution of marriage. It’s not for no reason that civilisation flourishes on the bedrock of a stable home.
Sadly, I know a number of such young men among friends of the family. They simply don’t see marriage as a major life goal. Some of them have been in long term relationships, but have not married. I don’t know all details; it could be that the girls involved didn’t want marriage.
Face it, cultural norms, if that’s the right word, have changed. Many young people don’t see value in marriage, or see it as a life goal. Yet these same young people, especially guys, are happy to live with a girl or have a series of girlfriends in which they are getting all the benefits of marriage without any of the responsibilities.
It pains me to see many quality young people who don’t want children or marriage or family. The future of our entire civilization depends upon marriage and family. Our culture as we know it will not survive as the “baby mama” culture of the ghetto spreads to the rest of society.
Shhh! If they find out about your wonderful county, they’ll decide it needs diversity. Then you’ll get some terrific Section 8 housing along with exciting, vibrant new residents, gang members, refugees, etc.
So when “Whites” are 5% of the population, will they still be blamed for all the problems of the world and will the government still be discriminating against them for slavery, jim crow, and the cop in the OJ trial saying the “N word?”
Yes.
What you said, and the anchor baby policy.
I wonder how they count children with only one white parent.
“Sadly, I know a number of such young men among friends of the family. “
My son is 30 and unmarried. He has had his wild times, and is employed in a stable job, and has his own home. He’d like to find a good woman and get married. Why hasn’t he?
Modern women, in general, are shrews. Our culture teaches them that they are superior, they are princesses, and they should never, ever have to compromise. Who in their right mind would voluntarily marry such a person? It would be far quicker to find a woman you don’t like and give her half of your stuff.
Hispanic is now a race? I know plenty of white looking people with Spanish last names.
"Since the 1965 Immigration Act went into effect, more than 30 million immigrants, most from non-European, Third World countries have poured into the United States. Today, most of the U.S. population growth is due to these immigrants, and their offspring. These results contradict promises made to American citizens by the Act's Congressional Sponsors, as revealed in their own words"
Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) quote regarding the 1965 Immigration Act:
"Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the sameSecondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.
Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness.
As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge the charges I have mentioned are highly emotional, irrational, and with little foundation in fact. They are out of line with the obligations of responsible citizenship. They breed hate of our heritage."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.