Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FutureRocketMan

Although i do understand the idea of “i’d rather have a liberal democrat in office than a liberal republican”
___________________________________________

I dont...


60 posted on 06/18/2013 8:30:38 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessee Nana

the republican party is supposed to be the conservative party. without republicans being conservative, the tea party would have little voice, because their candidates would win if they were a third party candidate (hence we have no “Libertarian Party USA” pols in federal office). To preserve that, Republicans have to preserve their conservative voice, meaning cut out, however painful, those “moderates” or liberals who call themselves Republicans, but are truly not.


62 posted on 06/18/2013 8:37:05 AM PDT by FutureRocketMan (Santorum/Perry or Perry/Santorum 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana

A liberal republican can do as much damage as a liberal democrate, plus they stink up the brand name. So a liberal republican is marginally worse.


64 posted on 06/18/2013 8:45:48 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson