Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farm Bill a Victory For Smaller Government
Townhall.com ^ | June 25, 2013 | Tim Phillips

Posted on 06/26/2013 7:36:24 AM PDT by Kaslin

The unimaginable happened for the second time this year on Thursday. Fiscal conservatives held their ground against expanding the size and scope of government. The Farm Bill failed passage in the House due to a coalition of conservative votes who thought there was too much spending, and ironically big-spending Democrats who felt there was too little.

With Boehner’s announcement two weeks ago that he would be voting in favor of the bill, the likelihood of its passage seemed almost imminent. Even withstanding those odds, thousands of Americans rallied with phone calls, emails and outreach to keep the pressure on those conservative members of Congress.

The bill was a ten-figure monstrosity—a holdover from Congress’ earmarking days that contained more pork than a Texas fire pit. Most of it has a tenuous connection, or none at all, with actual farming: including tax breaks for “farm-related activities” like reality TV, wine tastings and animal spa products.

Supporters point to the Congressional Budget Office’s weak claim that the bill saves money due to miniscule trimmings it underwent in the Senate, but those savings are manipulated by counting them over a ten-year period when the bill only spent for five. It was just a charade that helps lawmakers continue their reckless spending.

One of the most disappointing outcomes of this bill was Boehner’s insistence on pushing it in the first place. Earlier this year I joined millions of Americans to thank him for his leadership in holding firm to the small spending-cut victory called Sequestration. It was an incredibly difficult battle and while only a small step, it was important progress towards reining in government overspending. Sadly, that was the John Boehner of January and not the Boehner of June.

Instead of standing firm against the President’s big-spending agenda, Boehner sided with an unholy alliance of corporate interests and liberal spending fiends to rubberstamp more corporate tax subsidies and welfare growth. Instead of standing with the Americans who had his back in the winter, he tried to erase all the gains made by them and then some.

In short, the Farm Bill was John Boehner’s betrayal of fiscal conservatism.

This legislation included no significant reforms to the few actual farm programs it contains and they largely remain handouts for agri-business interests. A few of the modest reforms – like the elimination of the direct payment program—were replaced with even more expensive programs; crop insurance subsidies were also expanded without taxpayer protections; and don’t worry, the bill shields commodity programs and international trade policy from badly-needed reforms, too.

The little the bill did for small farmers left room for a ton of welfare spending: food stamps, which has nothing to do with farming, was 80 percent of the bill. The United States will spend more on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in this one bill than the entire GDP of Switzerland. While only 1 in 50 people used food stamps in the 1970s, the program has ballooned in the last decade. Now 1 in 7 use them, and Congress has made negligible efforts to combat fraud and save money.

This was a great victory for House fiscal conservatives and Americans as we stopped a trillion dollar monstrosity.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: agriculture; farmbill; snap; welfare

1 posted on 06/26/2013 7:36:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Let’s hope they do the same thing with the immigration bill.


2 posted on 06/26/2013 7:40:54 AM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sadly,American farmers embraced socialism in FDR’s time ,and have clung fiercely to the government teat ever since. A savvy “fasrmer” hardly need fear failure if he enrolls in all the federal programs that insure the crops,subsidize the daily operation,and limit competition. The downside is a mere loss of freedom.

On top of that,enormous amounts of farmland are owned and managed by big corporations.

They use the “ol’ MacDonald’s farm” theme but today’s food is more likely a factory farm product.

However ,we do enjoy a huge variety of food at affordable prices.


3 posted on 06/26/2013 7:45:49 AM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m SOOOOO happy that in this Judicial Oligarchy that has just crammed Gay Marriage down my throat, where the Great and Powerful President Oz has just tripled my electric bill by decree, where all of the cutting-edge technical prowess developed over all of human history is now focused on snooping into my emails....that greedy farmers out there will now be getting just a slightly smaller slice of graft.
/SARC sarcsarcsarcsarcsarc


4 posted on 06/26/2013 8:02:59 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson