|
Ich bin ein Dink
Erl, when has the dork NOT spoken giddy gibberish?
It’s amazing that such a low living ball of slime can speak at all.
Ich bin ein Jelly Doughnut.
Of course you do realize why he went to Berlin, right?
To get tips from ex-Stasi agents.
Doesn’t anyone remember how that large crowd came be to at the July 24th, 2008 in Berlin? It was due to some rock concert that Obama rode the coat tails...details anyone???
the way they use the word “evolve” expect to see Republican rinos pushing out pro al-qaeda legislation any day now talking about “my friends across the sand dunes”.
This is the way they think and speak.
When you are ignorant of facts, ideas, history, politics, policy, etc.... you are afraid of your own shadow - so to speak.
You sound JUST like this. It is words, incessant words that say nothing.
My brother was on the debate team in school and even at age 13 could (and did) write and deliver MUCH better speeches than this!
This is the way they think and speak.
When you are ignorant of facts, ideas, history, politics, policy, etc.... you are afraid of your own shadow - so to speak.
You sound JUST like this. It is words, incessant words that say nothing.
My brother was on the debate team in school and even at age 13 could (and did) write and deliver MUCH better speeches than this!
That wasn’t Gibberish. He was speaking in Austrian.
For all the power of militaries, for all the authority of governments, it is citizens who choose whether to be defined by a wall, or whether to tear it downWell, the artists liked to paint on it.Obvious questions media forgot to ask: If these citizens were the ones who got to choose whether to tear down the Berlin Wall, what took them nearly three decades before they decided to do so? Why did they have such great difficulty making up their minds? Or are you saying that they kind of liked it for 28+ years but finally grew tired of it?
And at least one woman married it.
Certainly the Communist dupes loved it.
Add them up and you probably have at least the 30% of the public who always defend any action by Obama or Stalin without question.
Well, we can add this trick to the never-ending parade of coat-tails the nit-wit has been riding on. There was an article published within the last month or so - comparing and paralleling Obama’s accomplishments with previous WH administrations. Of course, the author had to really stretch the truth to make a lot of it work, but it made me sick to my stomach how they try to make Zero look like The One, the Messiah, the be-all to end-all. Blech........
This is classic ‘forked-tongue’ BS from bo.
He says things to appeal to both sides of an issue:
Typical example, template —
“There are those who say ....,
but we need to reach a balance ...
I read that his Law Review articles did the same thing, making both sides of an issue think he was appealing to them.
Same during the 2008 campaign. Both sides thought he was supporting them (or could imagine that he was, in the vagueness of his non-statements).
This article dissects this method.
Some analysts call this bo’s brainwashing technique.
|
America’s first Jive-ass Turkey President!
